• ferret@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    I mean maybe in an early interpreted language like BASIC… even the Intel 8086 could count to 1000 in a fraction of a second

    • snaggen@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      This was in 1985, on a ABC80, a Swedish computer with a 3 MHz CPU. So, in theory it would be much faster, but I assume there were many performance losses (slow basic interpretor and thing like that) so that for loop got close enough to a second for us to use.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ABC_80