We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image.::Artists and researchers are exposing copyrighted material hidden within A.I. tools, raising fresh legal questions.

  • BreakDecks@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    You don’t need new laws to get it right.

    You say this because you think you understand copyright law. If you actually knew anything about copyright law, you’d never say this. Nobody who understands copyright law thinks it’s been done right, unless they’re getting rich off of it.

    Scraping data has been allowed for decades. It’s the foundation of image search engines. We allowed large-scale image scraping and categorization this whole time because we liked the results. Now that there are results we don’t like, we have a lot of back-pedaling to do if we want something different. New laws would need to be written to reign this in, and those laws might end up destroying the efficacy of image search engines in the process.

    As understandably upset that artists get that AI “steals their style”, existing copyright law allows me, without an AI, to steal anyone’s style that I want to, because artistic style cannot be copyrighted. If you want to protect artistic styles from being stolen by an AI, you need new laws to protect styles because they don’t currently exist at all. Those laws might end up having a chilling effect on things like parody and satire if aesthetics can be owned and protected.

    And this is just arguing against the ways the system isn’t, as you claim, already prepared to handle the concerns surrounding AI. There are countless other shortcomings. The entire system is broken, partly because it was conceived pre-Internet and hasn’t aged well into the modern age, but mostly because it protects giant corporations above all, so remember that when you’re begging it to protect small artists from big tech companies.

    • ombremad@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Yes, most image search engines are also unlawful. Google knows that firsthand. It’s not because it exists that it’s legal? You seem to believe that.

      It’s almost like if big tech corporations don’t care about laws, and the problem is elsewhere?

      • adrian783@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        even if it is currently lawful… why can’t we make new laws or change laws now the considerations are completely different?