We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image.::Artists and researchers are exposing copyrighted material hidden within A.I. tools, raising fresh legal questions.

  • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    You almost seem like you get the problem, but then you flounder away.

    Law hasn’t caught up with the world with generative programs. A.I will not be considered sentient and they will have this same discussion in court.

    • Ross_audio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      It doesn’t matter whether AI is sentient or not. It has a designer, trainer, and owner.

      Once you prove the actions taken by the AI, even as just a machine, breach copyright liability is easily assigned.

      • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Argee to disagree and time will tell, but you must see there are factors that haven’t existed before in the history of humanity.

        • Ross_audio@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Who knows how the laws will change because of AI. But as the law currently stands it’s just a matter of proving it to a court. That’s the main barrier.

          This is strong evidence an AI is breaking the law.

          • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            That joker could have been somebodys avatar picture with matching username.

            A.I. can’t understand copyright and useful A.I can’t be build by protecting it from every material somebody thinks is their IP. It needs to learn to understand humans and needs human material to do so. Shitload of it. Who’s up for some manual filtering?

            If we go by NYTimes standards we better mothball the entire AI endeavor.

            • Ross_audio@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              That’s why it’s a massive legal fight.

              They’ll delay a ruling as long as possible.

              They’re definitely developing a new model on vetted public domain data as we speak. They just need to delay legal action long enough to get that new model to launch.

              This is the same thing YouTube did. Delay all copyright claims in court, blaming users, then put their copyright claim system in place that massively advantages IP owners.