• doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    Ah yes, those damned educated people making choices that are beneficial to themselves and others. NEEEEEEERRRRRRRDDDSSSSS~!!!

    • fosho@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      after finding it quite surprising that folks here feel so strongly about forcing such a depressing life on highly independent creatures, I decided to look for the evidence myself.

      sure enough, it’s not as clear as you all think. one of the problems with the research is that it is incorrectly applied to all environments without merit. and the biggest issue of all is that most of the problem is caused by feral cats.

      so no, your absolute position that all cats must be indoors only is not fully supported by evidence. furthermore it is alarming how quick people are to impose their beliefs on other creatures with only a small amount of reason.

      • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        If you don’t enforce indoor only cats with high precision then feral cats exist everywhere as a result.

        Literally no environment benefits from thousands of fucking cats.

        You will look for any excuse to avoid the guilt of our failures as a species.

        • fosho@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          owning pets isn’t about maximizing environmental benefits. your own existence is a much larger problem for that but no one is telling you to live your entire life in a boring box because we have too many humans. this hill is not important enough to warrant all you folks dying on it.

          • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            If some people can’t minimize harm to the environment (and as a result, harm done to countless other people) then those people need their rights restricted. That’s the fundamental nature of laws: if you fuck it up for the rest of us then we’re going to have to step in.

            • fosho@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              which apparently doesn’t extend to harming cats by way of imprisonment.

    • settoloki@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      9 months ago

      Tbf right or wrong the way you come across makes you sound like a dick. Though it’s probably the autism

      • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Nah I’m just a consequentialist, we all kind of have that “your feelings do not deter me” vibe.