Summary:

Democrats are becoming increasingly concerned about a possible drop in Black voter turnout for the 2024 presidential election, according to party insiders. The worries arise from a 10% decrease in Black voter turnout in the 2022 midterms compared to 2018, a more substantial decline than any other racial or ethnic group, as per a Washington Post analysis. The decline was particularly significant among younger and male Black voters in crucial states like Georgia, where Democrats aim to mobilize Black voter support for President Biden in 2024.

The Democratic party has acknowledged the need to bolster their outreach efforts to this demographic. W. Mondale Robinson, founder of the Black Male Voter Project, highlighted the need for Democrats to refocus their attention on Black male voters, who have shown lower levels of engagement. In response, Biden’s team has pledged to communicate more effectively about the benefits that the Black community has reaped under Biden’s administration, according to Cedric L. Richmond, a senior advisor at the Democratic National Committee.

However, Black voter advocates have identified deep-seated issues affecting Black voter turnout. Many Black men reportedly feel detached from the political process and uninspired by both parties’ policies. Terrance Woodbury, CEO of HIT Strategies, a polling firm, suggests that the Democratic party’s focus on countering Trump and Republican extremism doesn’t motivate younger Black men as much as arguments focused on policy benefits. Concerns are growing within the party that if they fail to address these issues, disenchanted Black voters might either abstain or, potentially, be swayed by Republican messaging on certain key issues.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because if voters are excited, they may start voting in primaries…

    Every since Obama beat Clinton 15 years ago, party leaders seem more motivated to make sure their pick wins the primary than a Democrat winning the general.

    “Moderates” seem ineffictive because they’re not trying to just win, they’re trying to win by as little as possible. Like a corrupt pro athlete who’s not throwing the game, but trying to win by less than the spread.

    They know the reason most people vote for moderates like Biden, is if they don’t, someone like trump would win. It’s just the party leaders would rather trade back and forth than let Dems like FDR win every election for decades.

    • keegomatic@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ever since Obama beat Clinton 15 years ago

      Jesus I thought you were exaggerating and then I did the math

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If you think that’s bad:

        Biden’s first presidential primary was 35 years ago…

        He was the expected front runner due mainly to his (at the time) exceptional public speaking but got caught plagiarizing speeches, lying about his grades in law school, and even people finding out he cheated while in law school by plagiarising papers.

        But everyone forgot about all that because he spent 8 years standing next to Obama. And the only reason he got that job was to make old white people less uncomfortable voting for a Black guy.

    • Upgrade2754@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s a great way to put it. Both parties are funded by dark money interests, one drives us to the right and the other keeps us in place. This is described as the ratchet effect

      • Elderos@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        and millions are claiming the democrats are radicals, little do they know that the country was more progressive on certain fronts 50 years ago. So they have to resort to blaming gays and trans, because everything else about the current staye of the country is kinda right-wingy to begin with.

        • PolarPerspective
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right… because democrats totally supported gay marriage in the 90s. They weren’t all opposed to it at all.

          If you’re specifically referring to the liberal spike in the 60s and 70s, yes, you’ve identified the way society swings back and forth between being more liberal and more conservative. We don’t trend more progressively on average, it’s just a natural counter-culture reaction to growing up in a conservative generation. It’s the exact same reason the modern progressive generation came off the back of the 80s-00s conservative resurgence. It’s also why there are so many modern teens trending back towards traditionalism.

          You are the dominant culture. You won. Now the stabilizing effect will work against you, because neither progressivism nor conservatism are ideal on their own. Balance always returns.