Summary:

Democrats are becoming increasingly concerned about a possible drop in Black voter turnout for the 2024 presidential election, according to party insiders. The worries arise from a 10% decrease in Black voter turnout in the 2022 midterms compared to 2018, a more substantial decline than any other racial or ethnic group, as per a Washington Post analysis. The decline was particularly significant among younger and male Black voters in crucial states like Georgia, where Democrats aim to mobilize Black voter support for President Biden in 2024.

The Democratic party has acknowledged the need to bolster their outreach efforts to this demographic. W. Mondale Robinson, founder of the Black Male Voter Project, highlighted the need for Democrats to refocus their attention on Black male voters, who have shown lower levels of engagement. In response, Biden’s team has pledged to communicate more effectively about the benefits that the Black community has reaped under Biden’s administration, according to Cedric L. Richmond, a senior advisor at the Democratic National Committee.

However, Black voter advocates have identified deep-seated issues affecting Black voter turnout. Many Black men reportedly feel detached from the political process and uninspired by both parties’ policies. Terrance Woodbury, CEO of HIT Strategies, a polling firm, suggests that the Democratic party’s focus on countering Trump and Republican extremism doesn’t motivate younger Black men as much as arguments focused on policy benefits. Concerns are growing within the party that if they fail to address these issues, disenchanted Black voters might either abstain or, potentially, be swayed by Republican messaging on certain key issues.

    • o_oli@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 年前

      Maybe one that isn’t older than average life expectancy already let alone after another term. Just an idea.

      • DarkGamer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 年前

        Cool, if that candidate showed up and won the Democratic primary in 2020 I would have voted for them. As things stand I’ll go with the most viable one that’s most likely to defeat fascism. That’s the incumbent, Joe Biden. I don’t care if he’s elderly.

        • o_oli@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 年前

          I mean, I agree. If I were from the US I would also be voting for Biden. But it’s a really sad state of affairs there isn’t a better option. The system is ridiculous.

          • QHC@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 年前

            As an American, I’ll be the first to talk about the inadequacies in our electoral system, especially for President. However, I don’t think the tradition of incumbents getting the ‘benefit of the doubt’ and skipping a primary are a problem. They also aren’t part of the ‘system’, that is entirely the choice of the DNC. Presidents are limited to two 4 year terms, so why not run back-to-back? It works most of the time.

            The rest of the system is fucked.

            • o_oli@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 年前

              The DNC choosing the candidate is absolutely part of the overall system. If that’s how it works, that’s how it works.

              Which, is ridiculous. Maybe it makes sense this term but the fact he ran last time also makes no sense to me.

              A country of 300 million people and the senile are in charge, like dude there are far better people for that job, just retire already.

              Is that ageist? Yes and I stand by it. People over 70 and certainly those over 80 are in mental decline. This is just the reality. Why have a leader in mental decline? Absolutely wild to me it really is.