• unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    thats understandable but at least use something searchable that has tagging capabilities and is archivable so that you can come back to it years later

    • renzev@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      D*scord is technically searchable and fairly archiveable (messages never get deleted due to old age (in my experience at least) or if the original poster deletes their account). And some d*scord servers even have a Q&A mode similar to st*ck *verflow. But yeah, not the right tool for the job, not to mention ABSOLUTELY PROPRIETARY

      • cheer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I think what they really mean is searchable without an account, but otherwise you’re right.

          • vithigar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            9 months ago

            Or find lots of things that aren’t matches because it’s a fuzzy search with no way to search for exact text.

        • renzev@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Kinda tempted to make a bot that automatically joins d*scord servers, indexes all the messages, and publishes them to a public website

        • renzev@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Same reasons you’d censor profanity. To show that I don’t necessarily agree with or support them. Maybe I should start using the vomit emoji instead of asterisks like u/pancakes [joking].

          • pixelscript@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            9 months ago

            To me it comes off like you’re irrationally afraid to invoke its name.

            I get and appreciate that you’re trying to make a statement here, but in my opinion it isn’t landing the way you think it is. By giving its name special reverence you’re needlessly elevating it, not diminishing it.

          • computergeek125@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I get the statement you’re trying to make here - serving the name of a platform you dislike with the same reverence as he-who-must-not-be-named in Harry Potter (Voldemort) - but all you’ve done is obfuscate the search engine. Now if someone is skimming for information on the platform via search, you’ve hidden your comments and post from someone who might find your perspective useful. No one is going to try 15 ways of spelling a platform name (except maybe trying stackoverflow with and without spaces). Internet users are pretty lazy.

    • ѕєχυαℓ ρσℓутσρє@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Zulip is a little better in this regard. I’m involved in Lean, which uses Zulip as the primary mode of support and documentation. While it’s usable, I still think that a Discourse style forum is the way to go.