• IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yes, when you’re trying to defend the indefensible, this is exactly the kind of pathetic response I’d expect to read. Be better.

    • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Why is it “trying to defend the indefensible” when manipulation and lying by omission get called out as people here keep spamming “look the IDF killed 3 Palestinians” when it’s actually 3 terrorists (one affiliated with Hamas, two with Islamic Jihad) that got killed?

      You’re free to argue about the morality of assassinating three terrorists in a hospital. But it’s scummy to leave out the affiliation to try to mislead and gather more sympathy for the terrorists that got assassinated.

      • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Why is it “trying to defend the indefensible” when manipulation and lying by omission get called out as people here keep spamming “look the IDF killed 3 Palestinians” when it’s actually 3 terrorists (one affiliated with Hamas, two with Islamic Jihad) that got killed?

        All of that is entirely irrelevant. They could’ve gone after the reanimated corpse of Hitler but it would still be a war crime. I’m not sure why you fail to understand this simple yet vital point.

        You’re free to argue about the morality of assassinating three terrorists in a hospital.

        There’s nothing to argue. It’s immoral and illegal. End of story.

        But it’s scummy to leave out the affiliation to try to mislead and gather more sympathy for the terrorists that got assassinated.

        “But they were super, super bad guys” is a pathetic excuse. Do you posses a functioning moral compass?

        • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          23
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          All of that is entirely irrelevant

          Is it? If it was irrelevant, you wouldn’t need to leave it out to gather support for the assassinated terrorists. You perfectly know that the reaction would have been different if OP hadn’t left it out, which is why you still insist on leaving it out, and yes, that is scummy.

          Every reputable outlet is not leaving out that crucial detail:

          • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            It… is?

            Yes, it is.

            No target can have a high enough value to justify committing a war crime over. If you disagree, you’re attempting to justify something that should never be justified by anyone who would consider themselves a moral person. Sort yourself out.

            • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              18
              ·
              9 months ago

              No target can have a high enough value to justify committing a war crime over.

              Then you shouldn’t have any issues with detailing that the three were Hamas and Islamic Jihad terrorists when you refer to this incident instead of maliciously saying “IDF killed 3 Palestinians”?

              • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                15
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                instead of maliciously saying “IDF killed 3 Palestinians”?

                You’re confusing me with someone else, or trying to put words in my mouth.

                I understand you want to try and control the narrative but that’s not how this works.

                • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  16
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  You’re confusing me with someone else, or trying to put words in my mouth.

                  I’m referring to how commenters on c/world have been referring to this as “IDF killed 3 Palestinians” today thanks to this misinformation campaign.

                  you want to try and control the narrative but that’s not how this works

                  That’s… false? I’m not the one actively leaving out the fact that the 3 killed were Hamas and Islamic Jihad terrorists, which the AlJazeera article even admits. And I’m not the one trying to bury this detail with downvotes to keep the false “IDF killed 3 random Palestinians” narrative alive a little longer.

                  You believe that no one should be assassinated like that, whether they are a terrorist or not, that’s perfectly fair. (so I suppose you hate the way the US assassinated Osama Bin Laden too?)

                  But then, why do you feel that the affiliation should not be brought up? You should test your beliefs and go ask on c/asklemmy: “Is it morally wrong to assassinate three Hamas and Islamic Jihad terrorists hiding in a hospital?”.

      • muse@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        It’s maddening to watch people like yourself jump over themselves to shove words in other’s mouths. Never defended, not even by omission, Hamas terrorists.

        It’s like me saying “wow you support these 3 war criminals? You must also support the IDF gunning down civillians waving white flags and specifically targeting journalists to the point that more journalists have died by Israel’s hands than all the combined deaths of journalists during WW2.”

        See how that also makes you look like a piece of shit without you even opening your mouth?

        I’m not on Hamas’s side.

        I’m also not on Israel’s side. I’m just here to watch, helplessly, as this multi generational conflict keeps going, and more people die as the genocide ramps up.

        I’m also here to watch people like you twist themselves in knots to keep pointing out the terrorists to ignore the genocide happening, and pretending that anyone pointing to genocides enjoys israeli children getting bombed.

        In summary: be better. I get that you’ve picked sides in your morally upright conflict. But there is no good side. And just because someone pointed out that “your side” committed a war crime isn’t absolving the other guys’ war crimes.

        Two things can be true sweetie. I know thats a difficult concept for someone wanting to paint the world black and white, while ignoring all the red.