• huf [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    did they colonize the sahara for the stuff in the sahara, or because to control the coasts (where people actually live), you had to control the interior, otherwise you’d have constant raids on your ports?

    • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      no you don’t, nobody before the colonists bothered with direct administration of the desert folk because simply trading with them and some buffer defenses could keep the coast safe.

      • huf [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        so what did they do it for? who can paint the biggest chunk of the map to their own color? resources the sahara might have? control of trade routes to subsaharan africa?

        • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          to extract the resources, and probably a bit of pride to paint the map & connect the north with subsaharan colonies. by the time the French were colonizing africa it was faster to use boats for trade though

        • LeZero [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          At least in Algeria they have huge deposits of oil and gas in the desert

          Also the french used the desert as a test site for nuclear bombs