Maryland House Democrats introduced a controversial gun safety bill requiring gun owners to forfeit their ability to wear or carry without firearm liability insurance.

Introduced by Del. Terri Hill, D-Howard County, the legislation would prohibit the “wear or carry” of a gun anywhere in the state unless the individual has obtained a liability insurance policy of at least $300,000.

"A person may not wear or carry a firearm unless the person has obtained and it covered by liability insurance issued by an insurer authorized to do business in the State under the Insurance Article to cover claims for property damage, bodily injury, or death arising from an accident resulting from the person’s use or storage of a firearm or up to $300,000 for damages arising from the same incident, in addition to interest and costs,” the proposed Maryland legislation reads.

  • PopMyCop@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    It will be low. Super low. $300k is pocket change when the incidence for gun carriers to use them is extremely low. It’s why we can constantly mock the tacti-cool warriors for thinking they need a gun on them at all times. Plus, the insurance company has way more flexibility in proving their client was not at fault in the incident compared to the shenanigans they have to pull now for car wrecks.

    • MagicShel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s hard to imagine a reasonable objection, then. I don’t trust insurance companies very much, but if there’s one thing they do well, it’s associating risk with cost.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s why we can constantly mock the tacti-cool warriors for thinking they need a gun on them at all times.

      That’s doesn’t make sense. We mock them for thinking they’re in danger without a gun. Insurance is for the danger they create by carrying a gun.

      • kautau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        9 months ago

        thinking they need a gun on them at all times

        thinking they’re in danger without a gun

        Yes, that’s what was said