it’s also yummy

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Exactly it predates the English language, lots of words do.

    The English language is basically a neglected toddler by linguistic standards, it was left alone in a closet to fend for itself

    Edit:

    Also funny you just said it’s the word for salmon…

    Instead of you know, salmon…

    Laks just meant “fish” in the proto languages.

    Which is why OPs link doesn’t mention the spelling not changing, and why it’s wrong about the meaning not changing too

    Going from “any type of fish, living or dead” to “specific type of fish when prepared by smoking”

    Seems like a pretty significant change in meaning to me

    • Hegar@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I think by that logic almost all words in every language predate the language they are part of. Like saying that our noses aren’t really human because noses predate humans.

      a neglected toddler

      What do you mean by this?

      As island-based languages go English is probably the least isolated in history. It’s Germanic relatives are all nearby. Britain has had extensive links to the continent for the entire history of English and well before. It’s an international language and has been for hundreds of years.

      English also isn’t that weird just because it got a large infusion of (pretty closely related) Norman words after 1066. Korean, Japanese and Vietnamese all have over half their lexical items from Chinese, an unrelated language.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        What do you mean by this?

        The majority of the English language, it was only spoken by commoners with no formal education.

        Literally never went to school or learned how to read or write.

        Which is why it’s one of the hardest languages to learn, there wasn’t even a noble population who were helping rules be set logically, it’s a slang language.

        Which is why it’s almost impossible to credit the English language with any words except for things invented by English speakers.

        Other languages weren’t as bad at it

        And it’s not a huge deal…

        Until someone claims an English word has existed for 8,000 years unchanged.

        Then it’s worth pointing out how ridiculous that claim is.

        • Hegar@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Literally never went to school or learned how to read or write.

          You’re describing every language for the overwhelming majority of the last 150,000+ years. English is not unique in that.

          Which is why it’s one of the hardest languages to learn

          It’s not. English has a lot of irregularity to remember, but not the most. How difficult you find a language depends on your native language. English lacks things like elaborate case structures or grammatical gender which can be hard unless your native language has something similar. The ‘th’ sound is rare, but there are no clicks or tones. SVO is not the most common word order, but it’s not the rarest.

          there wasn’t even a noble population who were helping rules be set logically, it’s a slang language.

          Huh? That’s not how having a nobility works. Or what slang is. The rich aren’t more logical, and they aren’t concerned with making language easier. If anything nobles want more arcane language that takes longer to learn to better differentiate themselves from those with less free time.

          It sounds like you’re thinking of the prescriptive grammar movement where from the 1700s or so rich English speakers decided if it’s not possible in Latin then it’s uncouth in English, and started making up nonsense rules like no split infinitives or ending sentences with a preposition. They couched it in terms of being logical and correct but it was in reality a novel way of marking social class. And ~700 years after the English peasant/Norman aristocrat divide.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            9 months ago

            You’re describing every language for the overwhelming majority of the last 150,000+ years. English is not unique in that.

            Name a single language that didn’t have an aristocracy that knew how to read and write and learned formalized Grammer for the majority of that languages history.

            I didn’t read anything else you didn’t understand after that first bit tho.

            I can help a little, but I’m not teaching an etymology class over here.

            • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              18
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Name a single language that didn’t have an aristocracy that knew how to read and write and learned formalized Grammer [sic] for the majority of that langauges [sic] history.

              You do realize more than half of the world’s ~7,000 languages still have no writing system, right?

            • Hegar@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Name a single language that didn’t have an aristocracy that knew how to read and write and learned formalized Grammer for the majority of that languages history.

              😂 I’m going to be generous and assume you’re just trolling now and don’t seriously believe this.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                17
                ·
                9 months ago

                Cool…

                I’m going to continue to not use emojis and take a quick step to make sure I never try to help you understand something again.

                Everyone wins!

        • Pipoca@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Which is why it’s one of the hardest languages to learn, there wasn’t even a noble population who were helping rules be set logically, it’s a slang language.

          Which languages had nobles changing the rules of the language to be logical, and beat the peasantry until they repeated their absurd shibboleths?

          Proscriptivists have existed in many languages, English included. They’ve basically always been tilting at windmills.

          Governments tend to be most effective at killing languages wholesale, rather than systemically changing grammar. And it’s something that’s been far more effective in the past couple hundred years as part of nation- building projects. E.g. the efforts of France, Italy and Spain to squash minority languages like Occitan, Galician or Neapolitan.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            9 months ago

            Which languages had nobles changing the rules of the language to be logical, and beat the peasantry until they repeated their absurd shibboleths?

            Is that what people aren’t understanding?

            When a language had nobles that knew the rules for the language, those rules were documented and maintained, even tho commoners didn’t use it.

            Later, when education caught on, the commoners were taught correct grammar, spelling, and usage. Not what earlier generations of commoners used.

            It’s not that they enforced grammar at the time, it’s that we know about those languages is primarily from nobles writing shit down in that language.

            No one was writing English for centuries

            • Pipoca@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Ah, yes, that’s why the French still speak perfect Latin.

              Yes, old grammar textbooks have been an incredibly important resource for linguists, particularly for reconstructing ancient pronunciations. They’re useful for teaching historians etc. Old French or whatever.

              But we generally haven’t been terribly successful at beating students into using obsolete grammar rules and to stop using modern grammatical innovations.

    • uienia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      The English language is basically a neglected toddler by linguistic standards, it was left alone in a closet to fend for itself

      Please stop with those silly linguistic allegories about English made by people who have no idea how other languages works.