• thesmokingman@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Well, sort of. If you’re a corporation or have enough capital, you can continue to receive things without paying for them. If you’re able to understand how to set things up properly and can fake the right investment, you can get things for free.

    Please don’t take this as support for sovcit; I’m just pointing out that you’re wrong.

    • Windex007@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I think you’re a little bit confused about why large companies sometimes are able to continue to receive services from their vendors if there is a lapse in payment.

      It isn’t because they have legal standing, or are entitled to them, it’s just that their vendors are weighing the balance of probability: is it more likely that they’ll collapse and never get paid due to creditor protection… Or will they sort their shit out and pay late (as opposed to never). If they cut the supply of whatever the service is, that will damage the business relationship and it’s likely they’ll lose their contracts all together.

      And yeah, sometimes companies use this as a bullying tactic.

      But… There isn’t really any ambiguity in the civil law here: if you agree to pay for goods and services, and stop, then you aren’t entitled to those goods and services anymore.

      • thesmokingman@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I think you’ve fundamentally misunderstood entitlement here. Squatter’s rights, for example, are an immediate counter to your lack of ambiguity. The securities system is built around not paying for things to get things, as are most subsidies. There’s a way to do all of that correctly, which most sovcits don’t understand.

        • Windex007@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          You should go onto a sovcit forum and explain that yes, they can get things for free and that they’re just all doing it wrong.

          • thesmokingman@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            By your own telling, you can get things for free if you’re large enough or have enough capital. Sounds like you’re right there with me!

            • Windex007@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              No, I would be telling the sovcits that just because their services aren’t immediately cut off after a failure to pay, does not mean that they don’t eventually have to pay, and that if they don’t pay, their creditors will at the very least suspend the services, and almost certainly seek to collect the debt. Because that’s how it actually works. Both for individuals or corporations.

              • thesmokingman@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                There sure are a lot of buildings, a lot trades, a bunch of water, and, best example, a few sovereign nations on US soil that would disagree with you.

                I get that you think the rule of law matters. It doesn’t when you can afford the right lawyers or the right politicians. Sovcits are still crazy. It’s okay.

                • Windex007@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I’m not debating whether or not people get fucked in deals, or if parties ever stop paying for things.

                  When it’s an ongoing agreement, like a phone bill, a credit card, or rent, of course you can stop paying your bills. Millions of people do this every day. The question is “Can I force the other party to keep providing me the service that I stopped paying for?”

                  • thesmokingman@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    You have yet to address any of the examples I’ve given you, including the one that’s very legal. Squatter’s rights are literally forcing someone to provide a service without paying for that service. You keep trying to move the goalposts; there just isn’t a way for you to not be wrong here.