If "direct armed conflict" erupts "between Russia and NATO," Russia's envoy tells Newsweek, "the United States will not be able to hide behind the ocean."
  • TomHardy@lemmy.mlEnglish
    11·
    1 year ago

    …, dispersing radioactive contaminates into NATO territory…

    This you left out on purpose?

    • Lols [they/them]@lemm.eeEnglish
      11·
      1 year ago

      yes, what with it not being one of the conditions for an “immediate response”, and actually just being elaboration on the actual conditions

      thats why it says “or their proxies, or the destruction of a nuclear facility, dispersing radioactive contaminates into NATO territory”

      as opposed to “or their proxies, or the destruction of a nuclear facility, or dispersing radioactive contaminates into NATO territory”

      so sure, on purpose, that purpose being treating the text as if it says what it actually says

      • TomHardy@lemmy.mlEnglish
        01·
        1 year ago

        what? My point still stands NATO likes to sh*t but not to eat sh*t