• null@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    An creator doesn’t possess the less by their work being copied.

    Yes, they do. Otherwise, you’d have to pay for it. Without paying for it, you would’t be able to consume it.

    This is false. “Pay for it” or “Pirate it” are not the only 2 options available.

    • Zoolander@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      This is false. “Pay for it” or “Pirate it” are not the only 2 options available.

      What are the other options then?

      • null@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Not to consume it at all, obviously.

        Your measurement for converting potential revenue into loss hinges on those being the only 2 options.

        • Zoolander@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I have pointed that out as a possibility. Not consuming it at all, though, is not theft precisely because the person isn’t consuming it.

          • null@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            In which case piracy only accounts for lost revenue if and only if the pirate would have 100%, guaranteed, purchased the content if a pirates copy was not available. So your calculation does not work.

            • Zoolander@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              if a pirates copy was not available.

              This is exactly why my calculation does work. If a pirated copy was not available, they wouldn’t be able to consume the media without paying for it.

              • null@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                But they also wouldn’t have to pay for it. Which is the only way your calculation would work.