Article is from a renowned german IT centric media outlet. Topic is a new ruling that allows for government spying through trojan horses on the press. This ruling is highly alarming.

  • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The consequences would be devastating. Noone who would reach out to Journalists to uncover corruption, severe economic crime and other cases with government involvement, would be safe to do so.

    This would seriously harm democracy and incentivise relentless abuse of power and crime from and through governmental institutions.

  • DerWilliWonka@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Its so fascinating how our EU can switch between fucking good decisions and fucking terrible decisions all the time. I hope this will be avoided by the parliament

    • EE@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Especially when it comes to “security” laws, the EU often seems to be on a concerning track, while it seems to have good ideas for many other areas (consumer protection for example). Does someone have a good explanation for this phenomenon?

      • Aetherion@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Paternalism

        You cannot restrict and reduce restriction at the same time. Instead just restrict everyone, for their own safety.

        In multiple ways, contrary to the US and I think the EU is currently doing the best job of them all.

        • DerWilliWonka@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean you can totally not try to end P2P encryption or allow espionage against journalists by gov agencies. There is nothing power hunger driving them to do so

  • weirdwallace75@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don't quite understand. Would journalists be forced to install state-created spyware on their work machines?