I never thought about it before but I use upstream and downstream without much though. For my personal devices and containers I use Fedora but when it comes to servers and VMs I use Debian for its stable nature.

I also run Linux mint in my homelab with pcie pass though so it functions like a normal desktop.

  • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is an aberration. You must choose one and never deviate.

    Seriously though I think it’s pretty normal. When I install Linux i usually pick whatever distro at the time and end up using a couple of different ones. I have arch on my desktop and Pop OS on my laptop at the moment.

    • flashgnash@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      When you’ve hopped between all the major branches of linux you kinda realise they’re all the same thing with different package managers anyway

      That said you can pry NixOS out of my cold dead hands

    • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      I have arch (btw) on my desktop and Pop OS on my laptop

      Yeah, my desktop runs arch one laptop runs Ubuntu server and I have a surface 4 running Nobara (a flavour of fesora)

  • tekeous@usenet.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    11 months ago

    No in fact that’s a violation of the GPLv69 and Richard Stallman is going to come to your house and format your hard drive

  • Holzkohlen@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yes. It’s illegal actually. A Microsoft team has been dispatched and is en route to your place right now to install Win 11 S on all of your devices.

  • mvirts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    It would be weirder to like Linux and Windows, but hey someone had to write samba 😹

    • okamiueru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Only reason why that is weird to me, is just how much better Linux is. I’m too old to give a shit about a fanboy mentality. Linux used to be something you suffered through in order to get a tradeoff only available to power users. Now, my 90 year old grandmother has an easier time with Linux. It’s more consistent, and doesn’t break stuff nearly as often.

      A more controversial take, is that I feel the same about MacOS. It was a lot of work in order to reduce how often it is annoying.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Samba is much easier to deal with than NFS. I would use it in a all Linux environment honestly.

  • Jessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I keep going back and forth between Xubuntu Minimal and Fedora. Im just tooling around on a $38 Lenovo Chromebook, which has only 16GB of flash storage (soldered of course). Fedora has the smaller footprint, and runs pretty smooth. Xubuntu Minimal is, well, minimal so it is pretty snappy. Xfce is where it’s at for me.

    Sometimes having so much choice can feel like a hindrance when it comes to trying to find a district that checks all of our boxes.

  • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    I like em all to match usually. OpenSUSE Tumbleweed on the desktop/laptop, Leap on my home server.

    Though I didn’t run Arch on my server when I did on my personal computers

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Those are both good distros for those purposes. I’m not a fan of Debian as a desktop distro but it’s awesome as a headless server, and Fedora moves too fast for my tastes as a server distro but that’s fine in a desktop.

    So good choice.

  • dr_robot@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I do the same. Fedora on my laptop because I want a balance of stability and having the newest features. Servers run Debian, because I don’t have time to fix and update things.

  • Cwilliams@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Is it weird that, although some people prefer blue shirts over red shirts, I wear both colors?

  • DeltaWhy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    I use Debian on my servers, Arch on my laptop and desktop. Different tools for different jobs. I tried Debian on my laptop a few years ago but it wasn’t a good fit for me - my hardware was too new for the stable kernel, and the Wayland/wlroots stuff was too far behind. As a server though, especially since I’m mostly running Podman containers, stable and slow-updating is great! I use unattended-upgrades and haven’t had a problem yet.

    I haven’t spent much time with Fedora but I’d probably like it as a desktop OS - fairly fast updates, and sticks pretty close to upstream without a ton of custom theming for example. I would miss the AUR, but Flatpak covers a lot of what I need, and Distrobox could handle anything else.