Exodus Bitcoin Wallet: $490K Swindle
popey.com
tl;dr: A Bitcoin investor was recently scammed out of 9 Bitcoin (worth around $490K) in a fake “Exodus wallet” desktop application for Linux, published in the Canonical Snap Store. This isn’t the first time, and if nothing changes, it likely won’t be the last. This post turned out longer than I expected. So if you don’t have the time there’s a briefer summary at the bottom under “In summary (the tl;dr)” along with my suggestions on what Canonical should do now.

A Bitcoin investor was recently scammed out of 9 Bitcoin (worth around $490K) in a fake “Exodus wallet” desktop application for Linux, published in the Canonical Snap Store. This isn’t the first time; if nothing changes, it likely won’t be the last.

  • AProfessional@lemmy.worldEnglish
    1·
    10 months ago

    The repo is gpg signed. I don’t know why you think thats not sufficient.

    “packages” don’t exist like traditional distros. Its a large repo of data.

            • delirious_owl
              1·
              10 months ago

              No, my point is that if flat pak doesn’t document that they cryptographically verify the authenticity of packages, then they dont.

              Even the ostree docs say that it supports it gpg encryption. It supports it. It doesn’t enforce it. That depends on the implementation.

              I will continue to harshly criticize projects that leave users vulnerable. Want to prove me wrong? Link me to the flat pak docks that clearly say that all packages are cryptographically verified after download and before upload.

              • AProfessional@lemmy.worldEnglish
                11·
                10 months ago

                Look, Flatpak does, and it’s secure. You can spread misinformation if you like but don’t be proud of it.

                You clearly have no capacity to accept new information in good faith.