I think this decentralization and federation is what web3 is all about, without all the corporations calling everything to do with monkey pixel art that costs a million dollars “web3”

  • NeonPayload@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    web3 was always a cryptocurrency scam and was doomed to fail. Federation is more a return to the early web with a way to link everything together to compete and get similar services to megacorps while distributing costs.

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is what I keep thinking as well. The “kids today” don’t remember usenet, IRC, etc. All were decentralized systems capitalizing on distributed compute resources and moderation. They did have problems when it comes to direction, moderation, systems playing “nice”, fragmentation, etc. But I still feel the plusses outweigh the minuses in a federated system. Unfortunately the public does like their “benevolent (until they aren’t) dictators”…

      • NeonPayload@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s because a system where everything is controlled by one person is so commonplace that any other idea seems foreign and impossible, or more often these days not profitable.

        • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah - and it does simplify things a lot as well. A single entity can move a platform in a specific direction without needing to consult other servers, writing an RFC, etc. And the onboarding is much simpler by comparison.

          I think at this point the fediverse should turn its eye towards simplifying sign-ups. If only to make the language more clear about what you are, and are not, locked into when picking an instance. But also provide people with “I don’t really care which one I use” options to round-robin them to servers to distribute the load (thinking out loud).

          • NeonPayload@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s a never ending debate on how to “onboard” new users with all the growth. Honestly I’d think it would be easier to compare it to email. like a simple look it all works together just get a account and it will federate. It doesn’t matter too much where you sign up your account it’s able to send and receive email from everyone. But, everyone gets overwhelmed by choices and not knowing the difference between servers. Something like a email app where it gives you a list to pick and a other option would be good imo.

            • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Would be cool if there were geographic designators for individual instances so you could find one close to you. Not sure if that makes the experience better but I’d assume so.

    • joestaen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      yeah, the lack of brand presence is a convenient side effect, its refreshing, just like the iconic McCafé® blend. Crafted to perfection by expert baristas, just the way you like it. Get one today at McDonald’s®. I’m Lovin’ It!