• macerated_baby_presidents [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Honestly, I don’t know. It’s possible that violent direct action in the tradition of American civil disobedience would be popular. Burn down a bomb factory when nobody’s there to get injured, stuff like that. People felt inspired by pulling down racist statues in 2020 and that practice spread widely even though those wins are solely symbolic. The problem is that these things are difficult. If property damage type “adventurism” was easy, individual-scale, and not too risky, it might be something that atomized Americans would take to. On the right we have stochastic terrorism, because doing a mass shooting of random innocents doesn’t take much planning. But that’s incompatible with leftism, and besides it’s the product of well-funded right-wing media and not a self-sustaining movement. I also doubt that, even if the American consumer could somehow do leftist adventurism on a whim, that that would be able to grow into the eventual mass movement we need for lasting change.

    I also do think that like, a strike or protest that turns violent isn’t adventurism. Yes if it’s a small cadre that planned to fuck shit up, but not if it’s just cops attacking peaceful events as usual.