Was just talking at dinner with family, and it seems a logical action to ban circumcision, as in most cases, doesn’t have consent, and is a major (genitals are important) body modification. Can we ban it at the state level? Just a thought.

  • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you the problem with the anti-circumcision movement.

    There are good arguments to be had for banning circumcision. Refusing to recognize my autonomy, and insisting you know the “secret trauma of strangers” better than they do is not one of them. It makes you sound like an asshole who doesn’t know what they are talking about and will cause people to think the whole movement is the same way.

    For those arguing to ban circumcision: you need to purge assholes like this from your numbers. They are only doing harm and not helping your cause.

    • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Refusing to recognize my autonomy

      Glad that, as an infant, you exercised your own autonomy, when your parents decided to circumcise you.

      If you did exercise your own autonomy as an adult, then fine. That’s not what we’re talking about.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Your autonomy argument doesn’t work when you refuse to recognize my statements that I am not bothered by the fact that it happened to me. It makes you a blatant hypocrite when you say you are concerned about the autonomy of children but ignore my autonomy as an adult.

        Children do in fact need someone to speak for them. When you insist on speaking for me when I am fully capable of speaking for myself and telling you not to, then I’m going to tell you to fuck off and won’t be very receptive to anything else you have to say.