In this instance, should we ban NSFL, hardcore gore content? I think it’s not a problem since anyone can subscribe to the community they want but if the vast majority don’t want it, we can ban it. Decisions must be made from the beginning.

Here’s a StrawPoll link.

Edit: Looks like we are going to ban it. Commenters are right that we cannot currently list NSFW and NSFL content separately on the homepage. Since anyone can open an instance, we should let other people to open an instance on lemmynsfl.com. Also moderating these communities can be hard too. So it’s okay.

  • data_currator@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m surprised that all the scat communities were banned as NSFL without any warning or discussion here. What’s up with that?

    • yay@lemmynsfw.comOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      According to our poll, we had already banned NSFL. We decided among the admins that scat content is within the scope of NSFL and therefore we banned it too.

      • Leanne@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This is not okay. Unlike gore which clearly has significant ethical issues, scat causes no harm and is simply disliked by many people. Scat is already banned in many places of discussion, meaning that people in this fetish are forced to gather in places where actual child porn and bestiality is, because they literally have no other choice.

        Don’t do this to us, please. The community did not ask for this. Please, throw us a lifeline. Don’t make us go to a scummy instance full of creeps and actual pedophiles.

        EDIT: How can I raise this with the admin team? I’d like to make my argument to repeal this decision and have you guys look at it one last time. We might be able to come to a happier solution ❤

      • data_currator@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That still should have been communicated to the mods of those communities, rather than just banning with no notice.

      • doctorgold19@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        How have these communities been banned without any notice? How are you better or different than Spez? I fully agree with what @Leanne is saying, scat is not ethically wrong, it’s just disliked by people. You should have opened a dialogue about it instead of straight up banning it for a reason that doesn’t even make sense. We do not deserve this.

      • doctorgold19@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Since the poll for allowing scat has finished, can you restore the deleted communities, or is all of our hardwork gone?

  • averageCornEnjoyer @lemmynsfw.comB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes please ban it. Or maybe create another gore tag and let users automatically block or blur that content as they wish I guess that is the best of both worlds (Even though I persoinally cant find anything good in the “gore world” :) )

  • UprisingVoltage@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think it should be banned since, as of now, there is no way to hide gore by default.

    Let’s say I’m browsing the instance and choose to explore some new communities, so I turn on the local filter. I (and I think all the people who are not into gore, which I suppose is the majority) do NOT want, even by mistake, to see gore in my feed, especially if I’m looking for “normal” porn.

    Yeah, I could block the communities, but this would mean finding them, interacting with them, and then blocking them, which is not something I want to do.

  • wankbank@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I like the idea of blocking until we have more granular filters. This instance will be more successful if it’s not blocked by loads of instances, and I reckon allowing stuff like this will make the block choice too easy.

  • SquareBear@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I suppose you need to decide what is NSFW. Is it only the Lewd images people are posting? That’s pretty tame. Are you going to accept nude/porn/hardcore porn/fetish/furry? Violence? Drugs? Nsfl can be nsfw.

    So what is the purpose of this community?

    • yay@lemmynsfw.comOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The instance and communities are different things. Communities can have their own rules about NSFW or NSFL contents. This community (!lemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com ) is only for updates about lemmynsfw.com. People can subscribe any community on lemmynsfw.com.

      Now that we’ve made the distinction, what I want to ask here is should we block NSFL communities on the lennynsfw.com instance?