Dehydrated@lemmy.world to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 10 months agoSignal's Meredith Whittaker scorns anti-encryption efforts as 'parochial, magical thinking' | TechCrunchtechcrunch.comexternal-linkmessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up1368arrow-down14cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1364arrow-down1external-linkSignal's Meredith Whittaker scorns anti-encryption efforts as 'parochial, magical thinking' | TechCrunchtechcrunch.comDehydrated@lemmy.world to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 10 months agomessage-square44fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squaregeoma@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 months agoI have used it (molly-foss)but haven’t in a while, just waiting for it to enable OSM location sharing to switch back to it. Didn’t know about accrescent. What’s the deal about it compared to droidify or f-droid?
minus-squareDehydrated@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-210 months agoIt’s more secure than F-Droid. It’s still in a pretty early stage of development though and currently only offers a handful of apps. App signing key pinning: first-time app installs are verified so you don’t have to TOFU. Signed repository metadata: repository contents are protected against malicious tampering. Automatic, unattended, unprivileged updates (Android 12+): updates are handled seamlessly without relying on privileged OS integration. First-class support for split APKs: downloaded APKs are optimized for your device to save bandwidth. No remote APK signing: developers are in full control of their app signing keys.
I have used it (molly-foss)but haven’t in a while, just waiting for it to enable OSM location sharing to switch back to it. Didn’t know about accrescent. What’s the deal about it compared to droidify or f-droid?
It’s more secure than F-Droid. It’s still in a pretty early stage of development though and currently only offers a handful of apps.
Cool.thanks!