Civil liberties network says in states where far-right parties influence power, rule-of-law deterioration risks becoming systemic

The rule of law is declining across the EU as governments continue to weaken legal and democratic checks and balances, a leading civil liberties network has said, highlighting in particular a sharp rise in restrictions on the right to protest.

Berlin-based Liberties said in its annual report, compiled with 37 rights groups in 19 countries, that in older democracies with mainstream parties in government, such as France, Germany and Belgium, challenges to the rule of law remained sporadic.

However, in similarly long-established – so resilient – democracies where far-right parties are in power, or influencing power, such as Italy and Sweden, Liberties said deterioration of the rule of law, while gradual, risked becoming systemic.

In more recently re-established EU democracies, such as Slovakia, Slovenia and Poland, it said the rule of law “can swing rapidly - either towards recovery or decline”.

Balázs Dénes, the executive director of the Civil Liberties Union for Europe, as Liberties is formally known, said its 600-page report – used by the European Commission in its rule-of-law monitoring – showed the EU needed to act faster against clear rule-of-law backsliding.

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yes! Thank you for making the distinction between authoritarian and left wing politics. Folks hate Nazis and Tankies because of the authoritarian ideology. No one wants others running their lives and the extreme political spectra are filled with assholes ruining the lives of others en masse.

    Tankies are not leftists. They are Nazis with worse economics.

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I disagree with your last sentence. If there’s one thing they remotely got close to right on. It was economics. However, let me frame it this way. Which ever economic system you support, it shouldn’t be forced at tank point or threat of gulag. Or forced by a wealthy foreign power either militarily, or via economic embargo. They should be allowed to compete. Something that’s never really been allowed.

      That said, for all the problems with the USSR for instance, they had great economic success. For a time becoming a center of research, industrialization, and technological progress. China has had similar things that could be said. That said, it doesn’t excuse the oppression and violence against people they’ve committed. Just like it doesn’t excuse the violence and oppression of the capitalists either.