• Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    What I mean is that “back in my day” there were maybe 10 people in the world seriously investigating strong AI

    • Rolando@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      I know some people doing old-school logic-based AI research. They’re happy because there’s more AI funding in general, and they can present themselves as “what neural networks are missing” or “the next big thing”. Or they come up with projects involving hybrid systems.

    • Richard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s unlikely. What’s more likely is that you were not yet exposed to AI research and did not read through the academic reviews and articles of the time. AI is a serious topic in science and engineering since more than half a century.

      • Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I was reading papers daily, and there was progress but even in the field of symbolic ai the focus was on weak ai, a range of approaches that try to solve single problems. They were trying to find marketable techniques, not looking for the sparkle of intelligence. Then big data came and people started specialising in techniques that were also useful for ml, and boom.

    • Natanael@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I remember when Google started running classifiers backwards for the first time to produce the very first generation of generative ML. Very small crowd following it closely.