• tsonfeir@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Fun like fun to mock the dumb Christians. Also, it’s pretty vague and not step by step. I read it. It doesn’t have ingredients. You’re INTERPRETING

    • tbs9000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      A better challenge would be, “this isn’t a choice-based abortion and not a direct, meaningful challenge to modern, destructive, pro-life positions.”

      However it is interpreted, though, it does contradict the first principle upon which pro-life positions are based that any abortion is murder and therefore prohibited. My short time on this platform has led me to assume the average commenter is not capable of nuance and therefore assumes any contradiction is a stance on the polar opposite - I therefore must spend this sentence clarifying I believe the first principle of pro-lifers is absolutely false.

      The passage literally has ingredients of wheat, holy water, and church dust with instructions for use.

      • uid0gid0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        You might be thinking that wheat is a strange thing to add to this list until you find out what ergot is and what effect it can have on a pregnancy.

        • tbs9000@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          That just makes this even more sad than I already thought - how many honest women were deemed harlots because they were tortured into a miscarriage?