Nineteen staffers affected, according to Washington Post, with celebrated magazine to end newsstand sales

  • asteroidrainfall@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is why I subscribe to the NYT and in a way Minnmax (for games journalism). If you can afford it, news (no matter what sector) is too important not to pay for.

    • norapink@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I get what you’re saying but people shouldnt have to pay for such an important thing. Obviously news publications need money somehow but paying for news should never be required.

        • livus@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If you wanted to treat news as so important that individuals don’t have to pay, you would use a Public Service broadcasting model, which treats news as a public good provided to everyone and funded through taxes.

          (someone so old they remember life before economic neoliberalism replies).

          • zhaosima@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            People are shitting on Germans public broadcasting and its fee a lot and there have been a couple of actual scandals, but all in all the news and investigative pieces they produce are so important.

      • ripcord@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        A minimal payment for getting a thing like news seems absolutely reasonable. It was the case for hundreds of years, it requires money to produce…