Is there any benefit to host my own instance?

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    As someone who likes having control over their data and especially backups, and someone who normally enjoys self-hosting things, I honestly might do it. I’m not sure if I’d want to host a lemmy instance or kbin instance though, since I know they all federate together anyway. I may also end up waiting until the software is more mature too before looking into it.

    • Matt@netmonkey.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      That’s awesome! Running my own social media instances has become a hobby for me.

      Having my own Lemmy instance has felt fairly seamless versus using Lemmy.world, but there have been some kinks. For example, when attempting to subscribe to a new community, the server has to pull a bunch of data first. This takes several seconds, but the UI simply says “not found” – and then after several seconds, the UI updates with the community you want to follow. I figured this out by tailing the logs.

      Also, the installation was pretty damn easy, especially when compared to Mastodon.

      • ipkpjersi@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I’d maybe be interested in trying out self-hosting Mastodon at some point too, good to hear that Lemmy was easy to install though. I’m not too worried since I have quite a bit of Linux experience, I figure it probably won’t be too bad to setup whatever social media instances I’m interested in checking out.

        • Matt@netmonkey.tech
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yeah, if you’ve got a decent amount of Linux experience, I don’t think you’ll have any issues. Mastodon’s installation is well-documented and works. My only criticism is that it’s a bit long and you have to be careful not to miss anything.

          On the other hand, I recall installing Pixelfed back several months ago and having a difficult time. The documentation was lacking, and it required me to use Arch Linux, which I had never used. I was able to get it working, but eventually terminated the instance after a while because I was never using it.

          • ipkpjersi@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 years ago

            Oof, yeah, requiring someone to use Arch definitely seems like a steep requirement lol

              • azura@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                Wait. I’m looking at the Pixelfed installation guide right now and it doesn’t tell me to use Arch at all? Isn’t it just a PHP app?

                • Matt@netmonkey.tech
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  That’s awesome. This was several months ago when there was a link to some specific Arch Linux documentation that @dansup@mastodon.social mentioned was the most complete. Sounds like it’s been cleaned up.

                  Yeah, I think it is a PHP app.

                  • azura@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    mm. Might have been a getting started from the ground up kind of setup guide and the author might be most familiar with that. But happily it seems like there’s docker files in the main repo, including docker compose files, so that should make it quite easy to set up.

    • jcg@halubilo.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Personally, I went with Lemmy because it seems to be quite a bit further along in it’s development. It also doesn’t look like kbin’s developer is recruiting much outside help, if you look at the repos of the two projects on GitHub/Codeberg, Lemmy has tons of contributions from people while kbin is mostly just the one guy with a few commits here and there. Not to mention that Lemmy’s way less of a resource hog because it’s written in Rust whereas kbin is implemented in PHP. Also, as far as I know federation is still currently broken on kbin.

      • ipkpjersi@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        The reason why I’d consider kbin is because I almost think I might prefer the interface, also I’m more of a PHP developer myself so that is tempting in and of itself too lol

        I may wait a little bit before trying out either one tbh and maybe I’ll give both of them a try.