• orphiebaby@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I do like a lot of what you’re saying, but this over here made me raise an eyebrow:

    In the end, whether someone is autistic or not (as currently defined by autism as a diagnosis) is subject to an arbitrary line where the judge says “this is/isn’t autistic enough”

    So you’re saying that “whether someone is autistic or not is arbitrary, there is no finite criteria,” and “everybody’s a little autistic, some people are just more”?

    • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      So you’re saying that “whether someone is autistic or not is arbitrary, there is no finite criteria,” and “everybody’s a little autistic, some people are just more”?

      Not really, I’m fine with putting a line somewhere, I’m just acknowledging that such a line isn’t going to be objective, and some people would put it a little further or a little earlier.