What’s a nature website that doesn’t suck?

A test example is a site that has a photo of an iguana with numbers like the image macro I made myself.

Google was shit so went to a top result and I downloaded the fucked up Geocities-like page because it at least had what I wanted - an photo with numbers. To fix the page - I had to edit my local HTML copy. It was a real mess. At first I thought I deleted #13 by accident. Nope. #13 is in the photo but missing on the website page. And half of the numbers have no explanation.

Wikipedia was no good because they always want to explain things and force you to read. Example…

The tympanum, the iguana’s eardrum, is located above the subtympanic shield (or “ear shield”) behind each eye.

What Wikipedia’s editors should do is give you stuff an image with numbers or an infographic and then try to force you to read.

The original page if you want to see it for some reason - Basic Iguana Anatomy - wixsite.com.

Google really is awful now. If google was actually serious about AI - they would have used it already to fix their shitty results. The wixsite.com page is a top result because people want something simple to grok: like a photo with numbers.