ylai@lemmy.ml to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agoOpen Source Initiative tries to define Open Source AIwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square30linkfedilinkarrow-up1146arrow-down13cross-posted to: fosai@lemmy.world
arrow-up1143arrow-down1external-linkOpen Source Initiative tries to define Open Source AIwww.theregister.comylai@lemmy.ml to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square30linkfedilinkcross-posted to: fosai@lemmy.world
minus-squarevrighter@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·2 years agoyou released it under a non open source license. So very clearly: no it is not
minus-squaredelirious_owllinkfedilinkarrow-up8·2 years agoWut. That license is literally compatible with the GPL
minus-squareleopold@lemmy.kde.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 years agoCC BY-SA is considered open source. CC BY-NC is not.
you released it under a non open source license. So very clearly: no it is not
Wut. That license is literally compatible with the GPL
CC BY-SA is considered open source. CC BY-NC is not.