• UnshavedYak@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yup. Moreover, i want clients and implementations that help summarize and reduce doomscroll behavior. Social networks have value (imo), but they also have a cost and i’m tired of paying that. Reddit built a habit in so many of us to go back to it during any downtime, doomscroll more time than we wanted or expected, become overly invested in karma, arguments, etc. Reddit also has zero incentive to fix any of this, as it was perfect for engagement. Reddit is Facebook is Twitter, and i’m tired of those applications drugging my brain.

    I definitely do not want Reddit. I want the value we got from Reddit, without the cost.

    • oxjox@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Buddy, doomscrolling is your own issue. Are you old enough to remember “doomscrolling” cable television for hours at night? We’re all choosing to distract ourselves from something else or we’re just bored. It’s nothing new.

      I mean, if you’re having trouble stepping away from something, it almost sounds like you’re describing an addiction problem. Everyone should make it a practice to step outside themselves for a moment and assess all their habits.

      You’re not seriously suggesting that a platform prevent its users from using it, are you? LOL where have I seen that in the news this week?

      • UnshavedYak@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re not seriously suggesting that a platform prevent its users from using it, are you? LOL where have I seen that in the news this week?

        Jeez, this feels quite hostile.

        I’m a developer. I’m working on this problem myself. You can craft features which promote a behavior or inhibit it. For example focusing only on live oriented features, making sure that posts show up constantly and with little ability to see what previous came, i would argue, focuses behavior on addictive FOMO. Features that help summarize historical posts to leave you with less of a feeling of FOMO does the opposite. Quite difficult to get FOMO if the summary of posts only changes once every 5 hours, right? You should see the ideas here. All of which i want to explore.

        Features promote behavior. Some drive engagement, some reduce engagement. I seek features which reduce engagement by way of inhibiting FOMO and promoting the feeling of being informed on what it is you were seeking.

        I’m suggesting a platform which focuses on features that help users avoid what i feel are negative outcomes. Which is wholly different than saying that all platforms need to do this. Why is this controversial to you? Should i, and users like me, not be able to use a platform which tries to eradicate (as best able) FOMO? Is FOMO other people experience somehow essential to you?

        You can have whatever platforms you like. Just because an option exists does not mean it is hostile to your preferences. To me your reply seems short sighted, entirely focused on your individual use case and ignorant of a wide array of methods people want to use to interact with these products.

        I am focused on my slice and my pie. You can have yours too, it’s okay.

        • acronymesis@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can craft features which promote a behavior or inhibit it.

          To add to your point, let’s not forget that a certain social media site used their algorithm to boost content that angers people because it also boosts engagement. It shouldn’t be controversial to want a social media that, like, doesn’t exploit negative behaviors to generate more dollars, and I think your working towards something that specifically doesn’t do that is admirable.

          This argument that a social media platform not doing evil things also exclusively means it cannot attract an audience in some other way is a false dichotomy.

        • survivorseason44@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Seconding everything here — hostile/destructive platform design is so normalized for users (of Reddit and in general) that designing services that don’t encourage doomscrolling/“anger-tainment”/FOMO/etc feels completely foreign to them, or even impossible. But it’s gotta happen, otherwise we’ll just repeat the worst parts of Reddit (and other platforms) all over again.

    • Tashlan@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just to say, I 100 percent would pull RIF up in downtime but doomscrolling is not ubiquitous; I would pop into really specific communities to read about specific interests and shit that didn’t expose me to current events. I am an extremely politically plugged-in person, despite avoiding it almost entirely on reddit (unless I was in the mood), but I found shit like RIF actually allowed me to be more selective about what content I want at any given time. That kind of fine-tuned control of my information intake, of course, is completely lost on New Reddit with its barrage of random recommendations.

    • wryan@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      @UnshavedYak for real. It’s so refreshing not having to see loads of wasted awards on the most facile, idiotic comments. Or the obnoxious avatars people made in place of their pfp. It seems so hyperbolic but it genuinely feels great not having to see all that anymore.

      • LostXOR@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, the lack of awards is nice. Also people seem to be much less focused on getting upvotes and more focused on actual quality content.