• qupada@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    His might be the most level-headed take on this whole drama. Disinterested and dispassionate, just stating facts as facts, and opinions as opinions.

    Honestly, some of the other “players” in this saga could learn a thing or two.

    (Now perhaps 94 minutes is a little much, but that’s a separate issue)

    I also have to say it’s mildly ironic to criticise the “late” posting of the video, when one of the points raised is that of “post quickly / dubious accuracy” first-mover advantage content creation.

    • NightOwl@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      I also have to say it’s mildly ironic to criticise the “late” posting of the video, when one of the points raised is that of “post quickly / dubious accuracy” first-mover advantage content creation.

      Kind of a hard sell is what I’m saying for someone to post some video that is 1.5 hours long without a huge selling point behind why this video should be watched in its entirety and what makes it so special over all the other ones. Especially if they dont even know the channel to begin with so is yet another random youtuber that’s done a LTT topic video.

      It’s hard not to have a dismissive attitude towards a LTT topic video at this point when so many videos have been playing off the algorithm to draw views. Had seen one couple days ago where the channel said they got half their current subs after a LTT topic video.