I start: the most important thing is not the desktop, it’s the package manager.

    • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
      3·
      1 year ago

      I wouldn’t use ZFS. Too risky. If a new kernel comes along and ZFS fails to build or something, my system will be unbootable.

      Btrfs scratches my copy-on-write/checksum/integrated RAID itch well enough anyway.

      • supert@lemmy.sdfeu.org
        1·
        1 year ago

        Nix and ubuntu have in kernel support. Void’s module build system also prevents this situation. I use nix and void, so have never faced this problem.

      • supert@lemmy.sdfeu.org
        2·
        1 year ago

        I gave up on btrfs when Icouldn’t recover from a full disk situation (years ago, may be better nwo). But zfs tooling is so good, reliable and intuitive, I’d not want to switch anyway.

      • dmrzl@programming.dev
        42·
        1 year ago

        In contrast to btrfs it doesn’t break your data. Everyone learns the hard way not to use btrfs…