I feel slightly offended. Because it’s true.

(Alt text: “Do you feel like the answer depends on whether you’re currently in the hole, versus when you refer to the events later after you get out? Assuming you get out.”)

xkcd source

  • Lvxferre@mander.xyzOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    If I were to rely on my “guts”:

    • I fell in a hole - I was already inside the hole, and I fell.
    • I fell down a hole - I fell completely, I reached the ground of that hole.
    • I fell into a hole - I was outside the hole, and my fall made me enter the hole. That’s probably how I’d use it, in a typical situation.

    However I’m not a native speaker, and my L1 is rather relaxed when it comes to what prepositions convey. And from a quick websearch, Google lists 3.3M occurrences for “fell in a hole”, 2.2M occurrences for “fell into a hole” and 820k for “fell down a hole”; that hints for me that, by default, speakers would use “in a hole” here, unlike I would.

    • SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I am a native speaker, and I do take my word choices very seriously - often to the point of pausing during conversations to find the exact phrasing which will convey the shade of meaning I am looking to convey. I wrote fiction for a while, and it was always extremely important to me to get phrasing right.

      I agree with you completely. While I would interpret all of those phrases as equivalent (based on context) if they were to come from someone else, I would tend to use them in exactly the ways you suggest.