• TropicalDingdong@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    5 months ago

    Sen Mark Warner might as well be a Republican

    I would say that any one suggesting the Democrats stick with a candidate polling in the low thirties might as well be a Republican.

    Republicans need the Democrats to stick with Biden. They literally are fucked if the Democrats pick almost any other candidate. 70% of Americans think Biden is mentally unfit to be President.

    70%.

    Thats an insane number. Biden is over. He can’t win with numbers like that.

    There aren’t going to be any legal battles and its going to be the best earned media the Democrats will ever get in the history of the party if they go to a contested convention. The presidential election is nothing at all like a smaller regional race. Whoever ends up being the candidate will get literally billions of dollars in earned media by simply “becoming” the candidate. The whole drama of it suddenly engages what is currently a completely disengaged voting populace.

    So no.

    • WatDabney@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Whoever ends up being the candidate will get literally billions of dollars in earned media by simply “becoming” the candidate. The whole drama of it suddenly engages what is currently a completely disengaged voting populace.

      This is the most important bit IMO.

      At this point, I don’t even think of dumping Biden as just a satisfactory fallback position, but as a winning strategy, and specifically for this reason.

      It’s not as if Biden suddenly became a weak candidate the night of the debate - he’s been a weak candidate all along. As I just said earlier, the only thing that changed with the debate is that more people came to that conclusion.

      And all it would take to motivate the base - to get Democrats enthused in a way that they haven’t been since 2008 - is to throw open the nomination. That would bring the race a sense of excitement and hope that hasn’t just been missing since the debate, but all along.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        At this point, I don’t even think of dumping Biden as just a satisfactory fallback position, but as a winning strategy, and specifically for this reason.

        I see it as a prerequisite for victory.

        It’s not as if Biden suddenly became a weak candidate the night of the debate - he’s been a weak candidate all along.

        The debate just made it undeniable. The excuses for his performance at the debate have been even more embarrassing.

        • Dkarma@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Name one time…just one where replacing the incumbent 5 months from the general election worked.

          This is not just a dumb idea, but people who think like this simply do not have a fucking clue how politics works.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Name one time we ran an 81 year old who brags about beating Medicare.

            We’re already dealing with an unprecedented situation.

      • hypnoton
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        I agree with just about everything you say, but I have one question:

        And all it would take to motivate the base - to get Democrats enthused in a way that they haven’t been since 2008 - is to throw open the nomination. That would bring the race a sense of excitement and hope that hasn’t just been missing since the debate, but all along.

        What do you mean by “throw open,” exactly?

        I would love a real second primary with an array of candidates not all of whom were preselected by the billionaires. And a large inclusive debate or two. Is that what you are suggesting?

        Or maybe you mean let the billionaires and their purchased Dem elites make a selection for us in a smoke filled room behind closed doors?

        • WatDabney@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          I would love a real second primary with an array of candidates not all of whom were preselected by the billionaires. And a large inclusive debate or two. Is that what you are suggesting?

          Yes.

          Sorry - I thought “throw open” was a commonly understood phrase.

          It means to open something suddenly and completely - no incremental stages and no limitations - just immediately from closed to fully and completely open.

          • hypnoton
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I know what the phrase means but I didn’t dare to believe such an optimistic soul could exist. You proved my doubts were unwarranted.

            Very cool, and I support your idea 120%! I believe it is possible because the DNC just routinely makes up rules on the go, so nothing’s stopping them from opening a second primary. I would be super interested if it were a truly open and a properly democratic primary.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        At this point, I don’t even think of dumping Biden as just a satisfactory fallback position, but as a winning strategy, and specifically for this reason.

        100%

        It’s not as if Biden suddenly became a weak candidate the night of the debate - he’s been a weak candidate all along. As I just said earlier, the only thing that changed with the debate is that more people came to that conclusion.

        100%

        And all it would take to motivate the base - to get Democrats enthused in a way that they haven’t been since 2008 - is to throw open the nomination. That would bring the race a sense of excitement and hope that hasn’t just been missing since the debate, but all along.

        and 100%.

        Drop Biden and claim the W. Give us someone we can vote for and we will.

        • Dkarma@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Or just vote for the guy who has had win after win after political win for years now.

          Have you all been living under a rock? Policy wise Biden is killing it!

          We already knew he was old. Nothing has changed.

    • El Barto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Edit: downvoted by Russian agents.

      70%

      I would like to know how they reached to this number.

      Because it surely isn’t out of all Americans.

      Source: nobody polled me or my friends.

      Edit: not all Americans, as you claimed in your comment. All voting Americans; and my claim still stands. Nobody asked me or my friends.

      Edit 2: The same poll asked if Trump is a liar. Almost 70% said yes. Compared to almost 60% saying that Biden is a liar. I’m very suspicious of polls these days.

      Edit 3: to be clear, I also believe that Trump is a liar. Just that the Biden numbers are suspiciously too high.