• SupraMario@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    Cry all you want big boy, the science is on the side of us non-brainwashed, rational people who understand the need for actual gun regulation in a civilised country.

    I’m not the one crying, the 2nd isn’t going anywhere, and neither are my firearms. More and more people on the left are arming themselves, and the gun control types are becoming a smaller and smaller group. The support you think you have is basically on echo chambers like reddit and here.

    Too bad the US hardly qualifies to that group any more. Third world level literacy rates, so many homeless that human shit is an actual issue in supposedly civilised cities, and firearms as the leading cause of death for children. https://www.forbes.com/sites/darreonnadavis/2023/10/05/firearms-now-no-1-cause-of-death-for-us-children---while-drug-poisoning-enters-top-5/

    First, I’m all for social programs, ending the war on drugs, mental health, single payer healthcare and increasing our funding to education.

    Second, firearms is not the leading cause of death for children. It was during covid because of how many people weren’t driving and how depressed people got from being stuck inside and not being able to socialize.

    There’s a literal mountai in the of evidence showing that all you need to do to start facing this problem is reasonable nation-wide gun regulation. Something everyone knows works and something that you won’t find science against, because gun regulation being the answer is as clear to most people as is the fact that the Earth is round, not Flat.

    Tell that to mexico or Brazil, you also forget that all the places you love to claim have lower gun violence are places with social support for their citizens.

    But you will find Flat Earther crazies who won’t believe in the science even when their own science proves that they are indeed wrong.

    Not even in the same ballpark.

    You’re emotional. You get so angry when you’re reminded that you go against science because you don’t have the balls to actually use your own brain.

    Lol yea… I’m the angry one here.

    https://epirev.oxfordjournals.org/content/38/1/140.full.pdf+html

    Doesn’t seem to be loading for me

    Oh yeah no, it doesn’t bear any rationale to this argument. It’s just there because gun nuts always default to the “you’re just afraid of my pew-pew sticks, that’s why you support gun regulation”. Nah. I love guns, they’re fun. But you know what I care more about than loud bangs? That children don’t have to live in fear of some incel fucktards charging into their school with a pimped out AR15 with a bumpstock.

    The problem here is, you don’t seem to care that kids die, just how they die. Most murders happen with handguns. In fact, murders with ar15s are so rare they’re just included into all rifle deaths, because they’re statistically pointless.

    There’s literally not a single peer reviewed study that concludes that less gun control is better, for anything.

    That’s not how the second amendment works, it’s not there to reduce our violence. It’s there to stop a tyrannical gov…one of which seems to be coming more and more everyday. Do you just ignore the shit that’s coming out of trump and his ilks mouth?

    But I’m sure the lack of science won’t stop you, just like it doesn’t stop Flat Earthers.

    Statistics are what I look at. Which is why you thinking another bumpstock or AWB would do anything is hilarious.

    You’re really just here to prove my point about the willfull ignorance of nuts like you. So… thanks, I guess?

    Yes I’m the nut.

    • PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Second, firearms is not the leading cause of death for children. It was during covid because of how many people weren’t driving and how depressed people got from being stuck inside and not being able to socialize.

      Look up the definition of children used here. Also look at suicide and homicides as part of that larger number. There’s a lot of context that points to the fact that the root cause (obviously) isn’t the tool, but the system the tools exist in.

    • butwhyishischinabook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      People like them reek of the sheltered-liberal-20-year-old mindset of “the system is almost perfect, is we just make a couple of tweaks here and there it’ll be fine.” As if firearm restrictions alone will address socioeconomic ossification, the lack of meaningful state protection of vulnerable populations, deep resentment of minorities in homogenous, conservative areas, etc. Whining about how dumb people who hate guns less than they do are lets them get away with not doing the difficult work of addressing deep-rooted structural injustices. Fucking weak.

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          No, no it doesn’t. Everywhere that has gun control also has social safety nets… everywhere they have gun control and no safety nets, its bad. Brazil and Mexico… please explain those two countries which have very high firearm homicides but the gun laws there basically ban civilians from owning firearms.

          • Dasus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            No, no it doesn’t.

            Yes, it does.

            Refusing to believe science, asserting your bullshit as more credible than Harvard and Oxford.

            Always the same.

            • SupraMario@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              My facts are from actual facts. As I asked before, please tell me why Brazil and Mexico has worse gun crime than the USA, but has basically banned civilian ownership?

              Your “science” isn’t anything more than emotional bullshit.

              • Dasus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                What you’re doing is crying a lot, denying the actual studies which have been done in, among other countries, Brazil.

                You’ve never read a single one, because people like you never do. Instead you think your making aa good case by calling Harvard and Oxford studies “emotional bullshit” while thinking the garbage you pull out of your arse are “facts, my facts are real facts”.

                You seriously think you’re gonna “debunk” large peer reviewed studies by the world’s most esteemed universities by going “b-b-but w-what about B-Brazil…?!” (It’s called whataboutism, a rather childish propaganda tactic.)

                Since the studies are too hard for you to read:

                Within the US, gun violence varies widely. Age-adjusted firearm homicide rates range from a high of 14.4 per 100,000 in Washington, DC, to a low of 1.1 per 100,000 in New Hampshire. Washington, DC’s rate is similar to those of Brazil and Jamaica, which rank ninth and tenth globally. New Hampshire’s rate is similar to that of Chile. Even though New Hampshire has the lowest rates of age-adjusted firearm homicides in the US, its rate is still three times greater than the highest rate in Europe – Cyprus, with 0.36 deaths per 100,000.

                https://www.healthdata.org/news-events/insights-blog/acting-data/gun-violence-united-states-outlier

                https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/10/2/16399418/america-mass-shooting-gun-violence-statistics-charts

                https://epirev.oxfordjournals.org/content/38/1/140.full.pdf+html

                https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/hicrc/firearms-research/guns-and-death/

                You’re never going to admit you’re wrong, no matter how bad it gets in your shithole of a country. Why is that? Wouldn’t it be better to admit how fucked up it is, to start fixing it? Or do you just like living in an unsafe shithole?

                • SupraMario@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  What you’re doing is crying a lot, denying the actual studies which have been done in, among other countries, Brazil.

                  Where do you seem me crying? I’m not the one crying about guns, and screaming “think of the children”…you anti-2a groups are literally emotionally driven and actually do cry a lot about gun rights.

                  You’ve never read a single one, because people like you never do. Instead you think your making aa good case by calling Harvard and Oxford studies “emotional bullshit” while thinking the garbage you pull out of your arse are “facts, my facts are real facts”.

                  I’ve read all of these studies, they’re all designed to show that guns magically make people more violent and we should ban them completely. This isn’t news. The facts I use are from statistics from the FBI, statistics don’t lie.

                  You seriously think you’re gonna “debunk” large peer reviewed studies by the world’s most esteemed universities by going “b-b-but w-what about B-Brazil…?!” (It’s called whataboutism, a rather childish propaganda tactic.)

                  These studies aren’t actual studies, they’re collections of data that are correlationed to make gun ownership look bad. And I’m not the one that continually brings up other nations that have safety nets and gun control and say “what about this euro nation”…

                  Since the studies are too hard for you to read:

                  Within the US, gun violence varies widely. Age-adjusted firearm homicide rates range from a high of 14.4 per 100,000 in Washington, DC, to a low of 1.1 per 100,000 in New Hampshire. Washington, DC’s rate is similar to those of Brazil and Jamaica, which rank ninth and tenth globally. New Hampshire’s rate is similar to that of Chile. Even though New Hampshire has the lowest rates of age-adjusted firearm homicides in the US, its rate is still three times greater than the highest rate in Europe – Cyprus, with 0.36 deaths per 100,000.

                  Cool, thanks for proving my point. Gun laws in Brazil are some of the strictest in the world, yet they have the same firearm homicide rate as DC does… sounds like the laws banning people from owning firearms aren’t working.

                  https://www.healthdata.org/news-events/insights-blog/acting-data/gun-violence-united-states-outlier

                  https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/10/2/16399418/america-mass-shooting-gun-violence-statistics-charts

                  https://epirev.oxfordjournals.org/content/38/1/140.full.pdf+html

                  https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/hicrc/firearms-research/guns-and-death/

                  You’re never going to admit you’re wrong, no matter how bad it gets in your shithole of a country. Why is that? Wouldn’t it be better to admit how fucked up it is, to start fixing it? Or do you just like living in an unsafe shithole?

                  O… you’re not even from the USA…my shithole country is my country, worry about your own.

                  • Dasus@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    The facts I use are from statistics from the FBI, statistics don’t lie

                    How would the FBI have any data on nationally implemented gun control? Perhaps by reading studied from Oxford and Harvard.

                    What you’re doing again is crying instead of having any science on your side, even your “FBI facts.”

                    This “argument” is exactly what I meant when I was calling for a gun nut to come show their insanity.

                    You have a tantrum, deny the science and then say things like “sounds like their policies didn’t work”, when you still refuse to ACTUALLY READ the study and can’t provide anything against it.

                    Cry cry cry. Zero science. Like always.

                    Yeah, see I’m from an actual first world country, we have good education, so I understand empathy and how interconnected the global community is. But you don’t even care about your own children getting massacred. How utterly disgusting.