• Whisper@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t fall for it. All the research he conducted was done under supervision of a bailiff, wich in France is a guarantee that all was done respecting the law. He enforced this uncommon way of doing because he knew the government had issues with him taking other directions than that of vaccination. The reason he is now constantly under attack is because many associations who went on trial against european governments and europe itself are using his works to prove their point. Should the government manage to discredit the man all those trials would fall to nothing.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      His “trials” with homeless people were done in a totally unscientific manner. They deserve to be discredited.

    • japps13@lemmy.physfluids.fr
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I am a scientist myself, and I know what the HCERES says about his institute, and also that his institute no longer had support of the CNRS, which is telling considering that the CNRS only very rarely make such moves, as well as editors no longer accepting his papers leading him to create his own self serving journals. My issues with him are his lack of scientific rigor and lack of scientific ethics. Unfortunately, he’s staining the community as a whole, even though he lost support of several scientific institutions long before the Covid.