• Emily (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      It’s a good thing their reason is explained very clearly in the article linked in this post. They believed Alexa would have a high “downstream impact”, i.e.generate sales or subscriptions elsewhere in the company. Which it has so far failed to do.

      • radivojevic
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Amazon wants the loss to avoid paying taxes. They would never admit it is doing well collecting data.

        • Emily (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          Can you explain to me exactly how moving where profit is recorded from one division to another in the same organization reduces their tax burden? Because, excuse me, I know I only did a year or two of accounting courses before dropping the degree, but that’s not how I understand taxes to work.

          Also to be turning a profit by “doing well collecting data”, the open market value of the data Alexa alone annually generates would need to be around 8% of the entire global data market. If you can justify how millions of instances of “Alexa set a timer for 10 minutes”, “Alexa what is the weather”, or “Alexa play despacito” generates that much value, maybe you have a point.

          • radivojevic
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            “Excuse me”

            You seem pretty agitated, and I don’t want to engage with you if you’re going to be impolite.