Vor allem sexualisiert der Typ auch einfach offen im Interview eine Klasse voll 16-jähriger Schülerinnen? Dass so jemand überhaupt für wählbar gehalten wird ist eine Schande.

Well, considering that PS games won’t be published on PC anymore, I couldn’t care less.

But that’s the thing, he behaves like a parody of one.

You’d think an evil narcissistic rich guy would try to deal in the shadows, but Trump is just brazenly open about it.

You’d think an evil narcissistic rich guy would try to hide his pedophilia, but Trump literally publically lusted after his teenage daughter, and mentioned how Epstein has a similar taste.

It doesn’t matter what, Trump behaves like parody - and still his followers can’t see it.

Was haben die überhaupt immer mit ihren Noten und den Teilnehmerurkunden?

Das sind halt schöne Stammtisch-Aufreger, weil man gleichzeitig über Schulen und “die verweichlichte Jugend” herziehen kann. Hauptsache, schnell irgendwem anders die Schuld zuschieben - obwohl in vielen Fällen die Teilnahmeurkunden von ihrer Generation eingeführt wurden!

Honestly, it is. Donald Trump is a parody of an evil narcissistic rich guy, of course he’d turn the country into an evil narcissistic parody of itself.

I don’t know what mistake, but you’re welcome! :D I was just making a reference to that legendary wine commercial - I can’t see a picture of him and not have “Aaaahh, the french” popping in my head.

Als jemand, der Spinnen und Krabbelviecher überhaupt nicht mag, hat mir so ein Teil schon oft geholfen! Aber ich muss die Gelegenheit nutzen & fragen:

Kennt jemand eine Variante mit längerem Stiel? Ich würde gerne die Mindest-Distanz zwischen mir und dem Feind vergrößern.

I still can’t believe it.

Imagine you get invited to the White House. Sure, the current president is a PoS, but still - it’s a once-in-a-lifetime honor. And if nothing else, there’ll at least be some really good food.

And then you arrive there, and the first thing you see…

Aaaah, Orson Wells

Oh, did she start datamining real life now?

Let’s not act like the Democratic primary process has been going well for the last elections - look how they treated Bernie, and there wasn’t even a primary for Harris - after she was quite unpopular in the previous primaries!

That’s not to mention that the Biden campaign before 2020 gave many signals that he’d be a one-term president. They said “we have to rally to defeat Trump”, and then just didn’t care to build up an alternative to Biden since they knew people would have to rally behind whoever they put up, since anyone would be better than Trump!

Ah, I see, we are back to absolving Democrats of any agency or responsibility.

No, it simply shows that the Dem strategy of “putting up a turd that doesn’t stink quite as bad as the other one” isn’t enough to actually win when it matters.

We simply know that people are more likely to vote when they are enthusiastic. You can either keep telling people “do better” and keep losing, or you can accept human nature and use it to your advantage by running a candidate that people actually want.

Komplett nachvollziehbar! Ich würde mich dem auch nicht aussetzen wollen, und der Verweis auf eine andere Community ist eine IMO akzeptable Alternative.

Wenn eine DACH-Community mit diesen Themen zwingend notwendig ist, steht es jedem frei eine zu öffnen. Ich habe selbst eine starke Meinung zum Konflikt, aber die Moderation ist ehrenamtlich, und Diskussionen driften leider einfach schnell in eine Richtung ab, die ich auch nicht moderieren wollen würde.

I sure as hell haven’t played myself, considering I’m not an American!

But you’ve accidentally put it exactly right:

So because Kamela didn’t change her stance on genocide, you now have Trump who has the exact same stance on genocide, and wants to start 8 wars and a civil war as well.

Yes, because Kamala didn’t change her stance on genocide, you now have Trump who has the exact same stance on genocide, and wants to start 8 wars and a civil war as well.

One person had the chance to change it all, but it was more important to ensure that Gaza continues to be erased.

You could have convinced millions of people to vote, or to change their vote, and you’d still have to convince many more to change the result. Or you could convince one single person, and it would have changed the result. Which is more realistic?

Too bad it’s seemingly impossible to get a Democratic candidate who anyone actually wants. But sure, keep telling people it’s their fault. Worked wonders in '24!

What, Kamala had the agency to change her stance on Israel, which the Democratic campaign knew was a dealbreaker? Sorry, it’s an ironclad law of the universe that’s not possible. Guess you have to continue going to the dentist who keeps making you gargle literal shit.

Sorry, but that logic just doesn’t work at the population level.

A large group of people isn’t going to change if you keep telling them “do better”. You have to work with their natural interests and responses. If a politician manages to motivate people, people will vote for them. If they don’t, people won’t.

Please don’t fart 😿