it costs 50 bucks/yr for a Fortune Teller License with the city where I live. There’s no certification or anything like that but they usually just have to pay a city tax like a grill tax in some cities or like a fire pit tax. Ikr, my fiance and I found that out when we were looking at city licenses and that’s one of them. Not surprisingly, they’re one of the most volatile jobs out there.

26,978 Karma just checked my recently banned account that I’ve had for 5 years. I got banned for breaking rule one which is bullying, harassment or violence against a marginalized group for asking reddit something like: Why don’t we castrate all billionaires if we don’t want generational wealth? and all my accounts linked and I can’t comment or like. … I missed it for a little bit for the reason of not being able to correct people as well lmfao but I don’t miss it now that I’ve found something better.

So here’s what you do. You can make a screenshot reader app where it scans the qr code and reads it using a live side loaded cloud version of Google to verify it and then automatically switched back to graphene. Like your graphene security won’t break but the Google system will detect your device as being under the generalized Google services and then once the scan is done the graphene system kicks back in.

Sorta like a vpn/spoofing system that relies on jailbreaking the Google api?

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

You know what’s funny with people who have the narcissistic personality disorder, is they themselves do not see anything wrong with them.

So we click the things that say can not do challenge and we’ll pick the alternatives, no?

"Accessibility

For users with accessibility needs who cannot use hand gestures to complete the challenge, reCAPTCHA continues to provide visual and audio challenges, and develop more accessible and secure alternatives."

deleted by creator

Well… It looks like I need to go back to Debian.

funny enough I use “Deleted” or “.” on a different forum. So I’ll do that here if the conversation hasn’t surpassed too many comments going back and forth because just because someone doesn’t directly agree with my opinion or what I think or even doesn’t believe anything factual that has source links given along with it doesn’t mean that the information throughout the argument or conversation can’t be valuable to someone else.

Well when you’re down voted on reddit they attack you and make you feel some kind of an odd sense of shame because of the hive mind that if you don’t show conformity to, you’re the odd man out and therefore, down voted to shit and nothing you say reached anyone because your comment gets hidden after being down voted enough times that it makes you feel like what’s the point of even keeping it up if no one’s ever gonna see it unless they get curious enough to click it to view the comment you wrote which might even have more value to the conversation going off the central point of the main question op asked, than you could imagine and again it makes you wonder why did I fucking even if no one gives a fuck to the point where what you said gets hidden. Not removed, hidden. That hurts.

So over time reddit culture teaches people to inadvertently delete posts when they feel as though they have no value and it sticks with people. That’s why people delete posts. Is the unconscious muscle memory of deleting something they don’t think anyone will care about.

Maybe it’s about the karma for some people but to me if what to say has no value to the people I am trying to reach then I will remove it. Period.

I appreciate that this is an open source community where speech is more flexible which is what I was drawn to about lemmy but as with before I got banned on reddit, if I feel if my posts are embarrassing or show that they have no value to the people I am talking to, then I will remove them to not clog thread space.

I should’ve added a 🤪 to that because that was meant to be light not in a fuck off kind of way but more of a you gotta be kidding me this shit keeps expanding kind of way.

Then don’t use the internet because everything has Ai. Google has it, every browser has it installed, almost every shopping site automatically uses Ai results, the news feed on Google is all Ai results, the questions that are the most asked on Google are now Ai driven.

Main point of environmental destruction is using the LLM’s but nearly everything is using Ai and it’s hard to outrun it and a lot of things are making it hard to opt out and I wouldn’t put it past them to make it so they can make you pay to opt out of Ai in the future for a premium browser with the ability to disable Ai otherwise you’re stuck with it kind of thing.

I hate what it’s doing to the environment too but it’s not going away unless everyone in neighboring communities decided to bulldoze them and use their wrecking balls to destroy them. Emps aren’t hard to make happen.

If people wanted to destroy them they would. If people really didn’t want them they’d destroy them.

Turn down for what!

People treated me better for the first year then it was normal. My biggest was 286lbs (129 Kilograms.). I’ll never forget getting down to 168 and I felt like shit because of how little energy I had I feel a lot better at 189lbs-194lbs range but that’s because I eat better and I lift weights and exercise and I’m not trying to lose weight and I didn’t really use any weights going down but I did when I was trying to not feel sluggish from being too small.

That’s trippy to think, I had a group of friends in my early 20’s at my smallest and they were telling me to catch up but when I was an overweight teenager, I was being told to hurry up because I was big and therefore, slower.

Because that same hopelessness adheres to US capitalism. I care more about destroying the system from within.

a social capitalist with libertarian socialist views.

Are Libertarian Socialists the Same as Anarchists?

An anarchist by definition stands against all authority without exception, while a socialist by definition is simply someone who feels the means of production should be collectively owned. So, socialism is narrowly focused on economic issues, while anarchy is explicitly concerned with any and all social issues.

When a socialist also identifies as a libertarian, they’re indicating that they’re critical of the traditional authoritarian socialist states that have been so prominent in the world (the USSR, China, North Korea, Vietnam, Cuba, Yugoslavia, Zimbabwe, etc.)

But while libertarian socialists might reject one-party states, that doesn’t mean they reject states entirely. A lot of them will support democratic states or other democratic forms of government. Anarchists, on the other hand, reject all forms of government.

Generally someone who chooses to identify as a libertarian socialist rather than an anarchist is making a deliberate choice to use non-committal language that implies they’re willing to accept certain forms of authority. If they opposed all authority as anarchists do, they’d likely call themselves an anarchist.

There are various forms of libertarian socialism that promote a supposedly “libertarian” state, while there are other libertarian socialists who reject the state form, but embrace other forms of authority.

Communists are a famous example of libertarian socialists who embrace various forms of authority including majoritarianism but stop short of supporting a full-blown state. But the form of government they do support greatly resembles states on a smaller, more localized scale. Communists wholly advocate for government, majoritarianism, hierarchy and are probably best described as direct-democrats or socialist monarchists. Anyone claiming communists are anarchists doesn’t understand communism or anarchy.

While a few anarchists might also choose to identify as libertarian socialists in polite company, the majority of libertarian socialists aren’t anarchists, so anarchists would be better off avoiding the “libertarian socialist” moniker since all it really says about a person’s politics is they like socialist economics but have an aversion to vanguard parties. Anarchy is a whole lot more than economics.

To identify as an anarchist is to take a strong stance against all authority, while libertarian socialism, democratic socialism and other such milquetoast labels take no such stance, leaving the door open to all kinds of authority, with the only real concern being democracy in the workplace.

https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/ziq-are-libertarian-socialists-the-same-as-anarchists

from a previous comment: . So there’s 350mil people in the US. There’s 163mil working individuals. It’s 6.3E11 to provide $1,800 month which means if you divide that by the amount of workers you get 3865.0306748466257668. So I’m willing to guess that’s how much a month it would cost to the workers of this country to provide $1,800/MO to everyone in the entire country. Which means you’d have to make that figure smaller because not everyone makes enough to cover that a month.

So that means that if every worker reached that 3865.0306748466257668 every 9 months by paying 429.44785276073619631 a month in extra taxes…

It would take 9 months to gain the amount of money it would take to make everyone in the US a recipient of 1,800$ a month. Now it would take about 14 years to save up for 25 years worth of being able to give everyone in the US 1,800$. Which means if that money was held in a trust and redistributed in 14 years, it would then not be able to cover the cost of bare minimal goods and services for everyone in the US because within that time frame there will be more births, inflation will occur and the cost of living adjusts. That means that less people can have that money from the trust because now you have to account for those adjustments. Which means that even if you did have enough money to give everyone 1,800$ for 25 years, the amount of time needed to accumulate that would make it so that the very same 1,800$ is worthless.

That’s currently how social security works. There’s an amount of money in a trust that’s made up of tax payer dollars that redistributes that money to those who can not take care of themselves. They do a COLA (a cost of living adjustment) annually and give people more every year if you’re receiving from the government which means that’s less money for the next person that needs it.

The current problem is, that the very same money in the trust is running out.

Which is why I said, it’s not a possibility to be able to give everyone an income or keep everyone alive. There will be casualties and that’s usually do to societal needs not being able to be met by the fact that there simply isn’t enough to go around for everyone.