- 1 Post
- 1.12K Comments
Actually, most of us can tell the difference between a committed sex trafficker and the actual sex slaves she helped traffic.
If this does get said in her defense, it will be bad faith, and the only people that repeat it will be MAGA loyalists.
Yeah but when victims do expose themselves, it’d be nice if a bunch of online shit heads didn’t constantly chant 'women are liars! They only want money!"
Nice ad homin, I’m definitely going to take your opinion seriously now!
Oh, I tried this on shower thoughts. Get ready to read some depressing comments.
He didn’t even dodge his own bullets! /s
In the hypothetical scenario that this is the whole truth, what you’re doing is victim blaming.
It’s usually people who were victims of past abuse, too.
Especially past childhood abuse.
I think they’re being sarcastic…
Rooskie91toObscure Instruments@sh.itjust.works•The Doors ‘Whisky Bar’ played on my 1912 Marxophone61·10 days agoIt’s the people’s instrument!
Rooskie91to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Does the ping between your eyes and brain increase when you're tired?9·10 days agoThere have also been several studies that also prove this.
Your driving after being awake for 24 hours is as impacted as though you had a 0.1% BAC (0.08% is the legal limit).
Dirty bidet water? Are you sure that thing’s hooked up right? /s
Rooskie91OPto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•We wouldn’t need the Epstein files to prove DJT’s guilt if society just trusted women in the first place.927·10 days agoStop litigating definitions to avoid confronting your misogyny. I’m not talking about hypothetical scenarios. I’m talking about real court cases in which the judge accepted women’s testimony as admissible.
Rooskie91OPto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•We wouldn’t need the Epstein files to prove DJT’s guilt if society just trusted women in the first place.518·10 days agoIt is tho, whiteness testimony is admissable evidence in a court of law.
Rooskie91OPto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•We wouldn’t need the Epstein files to prove DJT’s guilt if society just trusted women in the first place.1219·10 days agoWhitness testimony under oath isn’t just evidence, it’s admissable evidence in a court of law.
Nice try tho.
I mean, a lot of those actors were WW2 vets. So no need to fret, we’ll get better actors after ww3.
He’d be so proud of Grindr
Women have already come forward and had their lives destroyed. If the general public believed them during their trials, or honestly, if they weren’t intimidated into dropping their case, this shit would already be in prison.
But the testimony of women is valued less by the justice system than the testimony of rich powerful men. That’s the problem. There is less trust in women overall, across the board in this patriarchal society.