m_‮f

  • 8.2K Posts
  • 1.39K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: December 11th, 2024

help-circle
  • m_‮fOPMAtoPerry Bible FellowshipContamination Zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    By “taken down”, I mean the artist took it down from their website, not that it was taken down or modded on Lemmy at all. I’m not really sure why, but the artist has removed a few of his comics from the site without explanation.






















  • m_‮fOPAtoThe Far Side@sh.itjust.works2026-01-24
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    Some background on this comic:

    Transcript:

    The Los Angeles Times, which carries The Far Side, has taken umbrage with my cartoon on several occasions. (Apparently, someone there actually reads the comics beforehand.) These three, as I recall, created some conflicts with the “good taste” standards of that paper, and I believe all three were deleted from their comic page back in the early eighties.

    The first two I suppose are subjective, although I don’t remember other papers censoring them. Their rejection of the elephant cartoon, however, had me baffled. I’ve always found it appalling that the demand for ivory has caused these magnificent animals to be continuously poached—but the ultimate act of contempt for the rights of wildlife has got to be represented by the elephant’s foot wastebasket. And that’s the point I was striving for in this cartoon—not that I was hoping to make a profound comment of any sort (the cartoon is really pretty inane, I think), but just who wouldn’t be upset to find out something like this had been done to a former part of their anatomy?


  • m_‮fOPMAtoPerry Bible FellowshipService Culture
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 days ago

    There’s no list that I know of, I had to go trawl through archive.org to find everything. Not really sure why it got taken down, other than that the author has said in interviews that he’s kind of a perfectionist and enjoys scrapping art that he’s already done if he thinks it isn’t good enough.

    You can kind of see that with my other comment with the older version of this strip. He redid it at least once to add some subtle coloring to draw the viewer’s eye towards the background where they see the vulture and get the joke. Probably just a lot of that sort of thing.




  • m_‮fOPMAtoPerry Bible FellowshipArtist (2026-01-21)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I interpret it as bullethead being a highly-skilled artisan that used ketchup (or similar substance) to create art. Ketchuphead thinks he can recreate the art but is missing the skill to do so and just has the raw materials.



  • m_‮fOPMAtoAskUSAHow SAD is your diet?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    My diet is pretty SAD. It’s probably higher quality than average, since I’ll avoid the cheapest possible foods that are chock full of artificial this or that, but it’s still not as good as eating real food.



  • m_‮fOPMAtoPerry Bible FellowshipNunez (2008-04-15)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s a pun on desert/dessert. At first you think they’re in a desert and the character pronounced it wrong/author spelled it wrong, but the final panel reveals that it was accurate and they’re on top of a large dessert, which is possibly also a desert as well






  • m_‮fOPMAtoCyanide & Happiness2007-11-04
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    He’s being abducted by a UFO and wakes up inside of it to see random teens instead of aliens, is the joke as far as I can tell. I found the last panel online used elsewhere but it seems to be a common stock photo and not a meme or reference on its own.



  • m_‮fOPAtoThe Far Side@sh.itjust.works2026-01-16
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 days ago

    Some background on this comic:

    Transcript:

    Reaction to this cartoon baffled me.

    Although for the most part I think readers understood the “gag,” a few individuals accused me of having fun at the expense of hydrocephalics. Yep―that’s what they said.

    I hope it’s obvious to most people that hydrocephalicus (I still can’t believe it) had nothing to do with the cartoon.

    Singling out any tragic disease for ridicule would never fall within my own standards―let alone my editors.

    So what do they think about Charlie Brown?