How would you want to pressure China? China is exporting nuclear power plants to Britain and electric cars to the EU. They are an advanced country that does not need western technologies. Unless you do a naval blockade, China doesn’t need us but we need China.
Is that supoosed to be a good thing or a bad thing ?
I don’t judge. I just care about the mechanisms.
No, they’re just narrowly constrained as to what they can do
It’s turtles all the way down. At some point, somebody makes a decision against public transport.
A good follow on Mastodon who’s an actual traffic expert
Thanks for the link. Frustrating content but good.
Die Aussprache von Orcas klang für mich wie AUKUS.
Inhaltlich kannst du die Manipulation nicht entdecken, da Orcas inzwischen Boote angreifen.
https://www.stiftung-meeresschutz.org/themen/tourismus-schifffahrt/orca-angriffe-auf-segelboote/
Der Ratschlag von mir war konstruiert um zu unterstreichen, dass wir Fehlinformationen schutzlos ausgeliefert sind.
Allerdings glauben wir bereits jetzt schon viele falsche Dinge. Stichwort ‘die Renten sind sicher’ und vieles mehr, gefakte Nachrichtensprecher braucht nur die Opposition.
Oh, I thought it was a self own. Thanks.
Ich habe keine Ahnung, woran ich das erkennen soll,
Über den Inhalt. AUKUS ist Indopazifik und nicht im Mittelmeer vor der Türkei.
You can support their decision making by evicting them once they are out of money. There is no need for social security money once people have other options.
It’s the other way round. Individualism prevents communism. People drive cars to prevent them from voting for those parties.
Downvoters, do you think all that bad urban planning is incompetence of the specialists while every comment section is filled with geniuses who for some reason are enlightened about public transport but never in the position of power to bring it to life?
It makes sense if she means to diss people with tattoos.
She says “can turn” in comparison to “doesn’t”. That comparison is not balanced.
I thought this was a quote.
As an observation, it is literally right. There is ‘Christian’ as a path of spiriitual growth and ‘Christian’ as a gang. That golden cross is a gang symbol and works as such. Spiritually it would be wooden. Golden, it shows membership of the Christian gang.
Tattoos work in the same way. Japanese know and treat them accordingly. At the very least tattoos of normal people make gang membership less despicable. If everybody marks themselves as non-normal, society changes.
This is not an argument against tattoos. They are just more than a fashion symbol, while those can already be spiritually influential, as many women on diets can attest.
Citation needed. In the age of disinformation, spreading quotes without a source is a sin.
Look closer. At least two of them don’t make the point you want to make.
We are waiting for the uniforms and parades.
It would help to host the Olympics, or if you can manage, a FIFA World Cup.
Digitalminister will offene Standards und Open Source zum Leitprinzip machen
Lemmy FragMichAlles wann?
A 2004 meta-analysis of reports in Current Directions in Psychological Science gave an overall estimate of around 0.85 for 18-year-olds and older.[16] The general figure for heritability of IQ is about 0.5 across multiple studies in varying populations.[17]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritability_of_IQ
But for sure this is about black, brown and unsettling white people.
reduce public bureaucracy,
If you know German, here is an article about reducing bureaucracy by the public prosecutor of the CumEx fraud.
Als Arzt kann man die geplante Legalisierung von Cannabis in Deutschland nicht befürworten. “Primum nihil nocere“ – „Zuerst einmal nicht schaden“ ist der Grundsatz der Medizin und sollte der Grundsatz der Politik sein.
Desswegen sollte ein Arzt nicht Drogenbeauftragter werden. Der Konsument nimmt Drogen nicht als Medizin. Falls doch, insb. bei Sucht, ist das wohl eher ein psychologisches Problem, bei dem Wissen über Viren so hilfreich ist wie irgendein anderes Studium.
I would think about why you don’t want to decide where to put things. You can’t know if it is up to you to make that decision and you haven’t decided yet.
People have to be convinced to go on a general strike. USA spent $5 billion in Ukraine, so with 10 times the population it will take $50 billion to get things going.
You always trade billionaires. People don’t act on their own so there is always essentially one rich group fighting another.
The fascinating thing is that there is no billionaire group opposing Trump. So there must be a convincing argument to keep everybody in line.
Yes, I would think so. But then there must be a plan, a convincing plan that is more advanced than enslaving everybody, all the while nobody is leaking it.
I am not happy with any explanation so far.
Desswegen müssen wir jedem Bürger intensiv mitteilen, dass er diesen Begriff nicht verwenden soll. Am besten erinnern wir alle wöchentlich daran.
This sounds impressive without anything that is existential for China. All commodities can be replaced if China pays a small premium for nonwestern sources while the rest of the world buys from western sources.
Airplane parts are inconvenient but China is starting to build their own aircrafts. If sanctions start, they will be able to create knockoffs for all necessary spare parts. But they also have a highspeed rail network, so they won’t be worried too much.
At this point in development, pressuring China will only accellerate the full independence of China. It would be Huawei on a national scale.
The dangerous part is that many former colonies won’t side with their former masters if they get the opportunity to break free.