It’s such an insane story that I wonder what the other side of it is. It’s easy to imagine the guy just having got out of a meeting ten minutes earlier with “if you don’t get Julia Roberts into a movie by the end of the week, I’ll see you never work in this town again!” ringing in his ears.
Yes. This is basically the core of why capitalism eats itself.
You don’t have to be evil or short-sighted to be a CEO, but if you don’t do evil and short-sighted shit to pump the share price there’s a high probability the board will replace you with someone who will.
This is why I believe the government should hold stock and sit on the boards of any company that gets publicly listed. Much easier than tying yourself in knots with an adversarial system of complex regulations.
The terrifying thing is that this is just a temporary technical misstep.
Musk’s response to this won’t be to pack that shit in, it’ll be to order his goons to figure out how to make it more subtle.
Did you forget a /s ?
I think at least a few of those objections are addressed in the show.
The reason I didn’t like it is that all the previous incarnations of Wednesday had her as vengeful to those who deserved it, but basically decent, if a little sardonic, towards those who didn’t. Whereas this new one was a colossal B to everyone she met by default; made it kind of hard to root for her.
Sure, but they have a crazy large amount of data and an army of Data Science PhDs who sat down and calculated they’d make more money increasing their margins on people who’ll put up with it, than they’d lose pissing the rest of their customers off.
All the rest of us can do is leave our Torrents running and keep our ratios up…
There’s space in the market for a better search engine. It could be built using an AI-assisted tool for semi-automatic curation by a team of a hundred librarians that could speedily vet the AI’s suggestions for quality.
I’m not sure the web is even that big any more, due to all the big web 2.0 social apps like Facebook and Instagram sucking everything into their uncrawlable platforms.
Many people do not want to put any effort into learning a new skill, so asking AI to do it for them is just way more convenient and “accessible”.
…and then they flood the internet with their garbage zero-effort slop.
Yeah, I was hoping I’d see less of that moving away from Reddit to a non-US site, but eh, what can you do.
When my parents bought in the UK in the early 80s, the average family house was £20k. But mortgage rates at the time were ~20%, meaning you had to pay £4k per year just to cover the interest alone, and the average salary was below £6k.
Yes, interest came back down after a few years, but a lot of people learned about Negative Equity during those years.
Also literally any day could be the one the Bomb dropped. It’s easy to forget how close we came, or how fucking terrifying it was that you had no way of knowing.
I was sort of on Mike Goldman (the challenge giver)'s side until I saw the great point made at the end that the entire challenge was akin to a bar room bet; Goldman had always set it up as a kind of scam from the start and was clearly more than happy to take $100 from anyone who fell for it, and so should have taken responsibility when someone managed to meet the wording of his challenge.
Are you trying to get rickrolled?
Great idea. What kind of business, I wonder? Telecoms company? Bank? Train network? Carmaker? Steel refiner? Power plant? Newspaper? Mobile phone manufacturer? Television? Oh wait, all of those industries are already heavily rigged in favour of the status quo.
Or by “start a business” did you mean buy a van and hire a local school leaver to help you do some landscaping and HVAC?
Sure, but it’s another hit for the myth of the “genius businessman” Musk. Though I’m sure he and his stans would claim it was a Loss Leader all along.
: reads headline
Woo! Good for them! Stick it to The Man!
: reads article body
ahhhh fuck these guys
good point, local Llama then.
Can someone with more patience than either of us please grab 10,000 social media posts from a year ago and 10,000 posts from this week, and run them through a lightweight LLM to flag up how often it’s happened?
Flooding it with fake applicants is of the few ethical uses of ChatGPT
Back in the day when it mattered, we did it like
#define BV00 (1 << 0) #define BV01 (1 << 1) #define BV02 (1 << 2) #define BV03 (1 << 3) ...etc #define IS_SET(flag, bit) ((flag) & (bit)) #define SET_BIT(var, bit) ((var) |= (bit)) #define REMOVE_BIT(var, bit) ((var) &= ~(bit)) #define TOGGLE_BIT(var, bit) ((var) ^= (bit)) ....then... #define MY_FIRST_BOOLEAN BV00 SET_BIT(myFlags, MY_FIRST_BOOLEAN)