I wonder when Brave’s local blockchain update will drop

Has it ever not been heading in a bad direction?

I recently saw a Hacker News article on people running some Deepseek V4 Flash variant on macOS, which is a surprisingly capable model for its size

Maybe there’s a way, but I looked all over the settings and internet and even had an AI agent do a search for how to enroll my keys and couldn’t figure it out

I have an HP Envy from several years ago and the BIOS is super locked down so I can’t enable secure boot on it. With my previous HP laptop, I had a ton of trouble getting the WiFi to work

Helix + my Nix-based configuration tool

On OpenCode Go, Deepseek V4 Flash is crazy cheap, and a lot of people are saying they’re getting good results from it. V4 Pro is said to be competitive with Kimi K2.6 and GLM 5.1, and its also a lot cheaper at least for now.

Imagine going out of town for like a week and the moment you leave your self-hosted mail server goes down and you can’t send or receive emails the entire time

Why shouldn’t we? This is just another reason why people like ICE agents are more useful when they’re dead

Even ebikes are going to shit with all their DRM, if you want a high end one

Why does this need an AI?

A stop job for unit adhd.service has failed.
See 'journalctl -xe' for details.

pommes_fur_dein_balg@arch:~/Documents/6/batch2/minecraft_videos$

Too many options so I just use the browser and it works perfectly fine

Using a nondeterministic graph isn’t a very good way to promote an economic structure

Robots. The solution for the disgusting jobs nobody really wants to do is to build machines to do it.

Then people will complain because it probably uses AI

I’m using the T-Mobile one (light speed maybe?) with a physical sim card and it works. (although I haven’t gotten texting/calling to work over WiFi yet)

Because Rust is cool and JavaScript sucks

Let’s say the only difference between two sets of programs/developers/realities is that one program is open source and the other is not. Scenarios:

• Some sort of attacker is determined to get the source code through any means necessary. If the program is already open source, the developer will not be targeted because of this. If not, then the attacker might target the developer in ways to get it leaked.
• Some sort of attacker wants to hijack the program to execute some other attack. In either case they will need to manipulate the developer somehow, but if the program is open source the attack would need to be hidden in plain sight, whereas for closed source that isn’t necessary so the attack surface within the codebase is much bigger. But depending on the project structure it would also be a lot harder to social engineer someone into accepting malicious code changes if they don’t have access to the code to begin with. At the same time, if the users think the program’s developer is compromised for some reason, they can typically hard fork core parts of the project if it is open source, which this possibility limits attack vectors further.
• The developer needs to hide something that people finding out will make attacks far more likely (i.e. something illegal). In this case closed source might help them hide it better (but the compiled output might also need to be obscured somehow).

If the only difference is strictly whether it’s open source or not (i.e. no outside contributors), I would say open source developers are safer unless something about the source code that’s not in the binary would provoke someone powerful.

Even the Gay Parking Only spots give you more questions than that

It can help with setup, but it seems like there’s a good chance that it will recommend something dumb like Ubuntu