Is this for an online community like Lemmy, or more oriented towards fixing the credit institutions?
in any case, a credibility metric would soon turn into a goal to achieve ^(karmafarming says what?)^
A metric ceases to be useful when it becomes a goal.
( thanks! do you happen to know other instances that have downvotes disabled? up until know, i just knew of BeeHaw. Choosing between an upvote or engaging on conversation is more enticing when you can’t just give a thumbs down and leave the room )
How to monitor which instances ignored the request?
That just seems like someone read about Roko’s basilisk and decided to rebrand that nightmare as the mission/vision of a company.
What a time to be alive!
thanks !
so many movies i wasn’t even aware were Blumhouse productions; I have many to pick now for my Hallooween film list :D
Truth or Dare was so bad it turned out funny.
what is 9?
exactly! trying to plot this is in 2D is hella confusing.
plus the y-axis doesn’t really make sense to me. are we only comparing humans and LLMs? where do turtles lie on this scale? what about parrots?
the e/acc stuff makes them look like a cult
unsure what that acronym means. in what sense are they like a cult?
at that point I start recycling them, and go back to parenthesis.
so when bp = 300x - 3, this:
4( 4[ 4{ 15bp + 10 } - 375 ] - 2250 ) - 15000
would turn to
4( 4[ 4{ 15( 300x - 3) + 10 } - 375 ] - 2250 ) - 15000
perhaps not the best, but I rather stick to conventional symbols rather than using… idk, question marks? that’d be funny as hell, though
just picture it:
4© 4« 4¿ 15bp + 10 ? - 375 » - 2250 🄯 - 15000
mind expanding on what these solve?
ELI5 how can i root my device?
may we get some pointers on what did you start with?
Don’t use your funny words on me, magic one
The fact that I didn’t notice the end of your post, and started mindlessly scrolling through the Related Posts is hilarious and sadly ironic.
isn’t this a good change though?
Amazing: surprisingly simple, yet complex and fun! Also there’s the added bonus that you get to vent, ha.
Awesome. I tried to stick to the developer’s instance, but the captcha works too well.
Your recommendation is now my default, thanks! May you have a delightful meal.
This is what made YouTube rabbit holes fun a few years ago. Now we’re all in our own echo chambers.
The last two are just objectively untrue.
Perhaps «monitoring» was too strong of a word…
I’ll rephrase: if a layperson wanted to check if an instance is not following through, how could they confirm it?