I’m just saying you could use theory to make a better argument then “libs eat cock”

*Democrat Socialists

Sure, and how do you know your thoughts are your own? Like if you have to defend your position by questioning the nature of reality then you got bigger problems.

Just another terminally online ML ignoring material conditions and doing the woke scolding that libs love to do.

Go read what Turing proposed, it is a lot more complex then how it is often parroted. There are many more tests that the latest models would not pass, like explaining poetry (that it was not trained on)

I see the point that the LLM is closer to a 1bit perceptron then it is to the brain?

A simulation that isn’t aware that it is a simulation is not self-aware, which is a qualitative difference from what is being simulated. Consciousness isn’t like some rom you can emulate.

I meam that’s how it was after the founding of the USA. See the sedition act.

We have Facebook …

Is that suppose to impress us? I too can copy code

We wouldn’t even call it AI anything then. The whole framing as it is now is to undermine creative work. It’s hard to imagine how it would even remotely resemble what it is now, a cold reading con.

Do you think Musk is making good faith arguments, and if so, what are they?

Ehh, the devil is in the details. Most DAC techniques requires more energy to capture the CO2 then the energy used to produce the CO2. This particular site might not have that issue, the article doesn’t say, but they are pumping the CO2 underground to be stored. Which sounds a lot like phracking… (I doubt they are pumping the CO2 into the rocks as a gas)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kill_line

The concept of “kill line” is incompatible with such a view point.

Didn’t we fight a cold war over this? The Soviets wanted a top down internet and it was more expensive and less capable

Depends. What do you think about a suicide as a response from being laid off?

The difference between 10 million dollars and a billion dollars is roughly 1 billion dollars

To deny the difference is to deny what makes the spectacle compelling

The point is that while making a moral argument should be enough, people are motivated by material conditions