• Rikudou_Sage
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33 months ago

      That apps published there can’t be wrappers around a web application.

      • @Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        133 months ago

        Good rule, those should be web addresses, not apps. Or even better, native applications rather than web apps, but it does depend on the context.

        • Rikudou_Sage
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Eh… why? More to the point, it’s not mentioned anywhere in their guidelines, it was made up on the spot by the fella doing the code review.

          • @Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            113 months ago

            They are inefficient and bloated.

            And personally, I prefer good reasoning over good rules. If something comes up that is a bad idea but there’s no existing rule against it, the rules should be changed to address it. As long as the reasoning is sound, I think it’s a good thing, especially when we’re talking about something like a software distribution platform as opposed to say laws that determine freedom or imprisonment.

            • @RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              103 months ago

              Also if you’ve made a web app, let it be installed as a web app. Both FF and Chrome let you install web apps in one click.

            • Rikudou_Sage
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -23 months ago

              Inefficient and bloated describes 90% of all apps I’ve ever seen, regardless of technology used, so I fail to see your point.

      • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 months ago

        If you really want to have it available on F-Droid, you can always put it in a separate repository. So I can see it being annoying that they reject it from their repo, but there’s still a reasonable path forward.

        • Rikudou_Sage
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 months ago

          Well, I have the app on Google Play store, which was originally meant to be the alternative, now it’s the main store.

        • Rikudou_Sage
          link
          fedilink
          English
          43 months ago

          Not WebView, but a so-called TWA, aka Trusted Web Activity, a features specifically designed to wrap PWAs and give them full-blown app capabilities.

          • @hedgehog@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            23 months ago

            What additional capabilities does that give the app beyond using Firefox or Chrome to install it as a PWA?