Could this be a cautionary tale for another recently turned VR-maker tech giant?

  • FREEZX
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    Had the opportunity to try out and develop for the hololens 2. I don’t dig it at all. It’s still big, has a tiny field of view, and when I compare it to VR, it’s so much less immersive. Not that it’s not impressive technology - it totally is. The best IMO would probably be a mix of both - high FOV, direct, no-camera passthrough that can be blacked out on demand. Meanwhile, VR is king, although a bit of a niche because of all the setup, required room etc.

    • be_excellent_to_each_other
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      I was just using it as the only example I know of that has really demonstrated some of what AR can do. I agree (based only on what I’ve seen) that it’s not ready for primetime, and plus it’s expensive.

      However - my son has a Quest 2, we’ve played it, I love it. But whereas I can’t imagine wanting to spend my day in VR all day every day, even if it were smaller and lighter, I would LOVE to reach the point before I die where everyone has some normal looking glasses (or even contacts) that are adding a functional or decorative (but mostly functional) layer over everything they do all day long - that seems both useful and futuristic in a way that could be a paradigm shift as big or bigger than smartphones were.

      VR is cool, it’s fun, and I’m sure it will get cooler and more fun - but while I am guessing it really will finally revolutionize gaming someday, and may also revolutionize very specific industrial or medical uses, AR seems (to me) like it’s got a lot more potential to become ubiquitous and life-changing for more people in more circumstances.