UltraHamster64 to Fuck AI@lemmy.world • 17 days agoPhotographer Disqualified from AI image contest after winning with real photolemmy.worldimagemessage-square15fedilinkarrow-up1330arrow-down127file-text
arrow-up1303arrow-down1imagePhotographer Disqualified from AI image contest after winning with real photolemmy.worldUltraHamster64 to Fuck AI@lemmy.world • 17 days agomessage-square15fedilinkfile-text
https://petapixel.com/2024/06/12/photographer-disqualified-from-ai-image-contest-after-winning-with-real-photo/
minus-square@dogsoahC@lemm.eelinkfedilink1•17 days agoWhat is the point then? (Sorry if it’s explained in the linked article, I don’t have time to read that rn, maybe later.)
minus-square@ReiRose@lemmy.worldcakelinkfedilink11•17 days agoThe point the photographer claims they were making is that real is better than AI and creatives are better than programs.
minus-square@dogsoahC@lemm.eelinkfedilink3•17 days agoOkay, then I get what it was for as a protest. But as for the photographer being disqualified… yeah? Makes sense? Not that having an AI competition makes any sense to begin with, though.
minus-square@WolfLink@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink9•17 days agoNobody is disagreeing with the disqualification. The photographer himself expected it.
minus-square@dogsoahC@lemm.eelinkfedilink2•17 days agoOkay, I just got confused by the discourse, it seems.
What is the point then? (Sorry if it’s explained in the linked article, I don’t have time to read that rn, maybe later.)
The point the photographer claims they were making is that real is better than AI and creatives are better than programs.
Okay, then I get what it was for as a protest. But as for the photographer being disqualified… yeah? Makes sense? Not that having an AI competition makes any sense to begin with, though.
Nobody is disagreeing with the disqualification. The photographer himself expected it.
Okay, I just got confused by the discourse, it seems.